Literature DB >> 9925810

Sexual selection by male choice in monogamous and polygynous human populations.

Y Ihara1, K Aoki.   

Abstract

The theoretical possibility of coevolution of a viability-reducing female physical trait and a male mating preference for that trait by Fisherian sexual selection in monogamous and polygynous populations is demonstrated using two-locus haploid models. It is assumed that there is dichotomous variation in male resources, resource-rich males have a wider choice among females than resource-poor males, and a female has greater reproductive success when mated with a resource-rich male than a resource-poor one. Under these assumptions, we find that sexual selection operates effectively when female reproductive success is strongly dependent on male resource, the proportion of females that mate with resource-rich males is neither small nor large, the degree of polygyny is low, and resources are inherited from father to son. We suggest that some human female physical traits may have evolved by sexual selection through male choice. The evolution of skin color by sexual selection is discussed as an example. Copyright 1999 Academic Press.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 9925810     DOI: 10.1006/tpbi.1998.1388

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theor Popul Biol        ISSN: 0040-5809            Impact factor:   1.570


  9 in total

1.  Mate choice trade-offs and women's preference for physically attractive men.

Authors:  D Waynforth
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2001-09

2.  The evolution of postpairing male mate choice.

Authors:  Nan Lyu; Maria R Servedio; Huw Lloyd; Yue-Hua Sun
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 3.694

3.  Cultural sexual selection in monogamous human populations.

Authors:  Wataru Nakahashi
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 2.963

4.  The evolution of male mate choice and female ornamentation: a review of mathematical models.

Authors:  Courtney L Fitzpatrick; Maria R Servedio
Journal:  Curr Zool       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 2.624

5.  Gender is not simply a matter of black and white, or is it?

Authors:  Gün R Semin; Tomás Palma; Cengiz Acartürk; Aleksandra Dziuba
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-08-05       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Evolution of a mating preference for a dual-utility trait used in intrasexual competition in genetically monogamous populations.

Authors:  Caitlin A Stern; Maria R Servedio
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-09-02       Impact factor: 2.912

7.  Genetic loci associated with skin pigmentation in African Americans and their effects on vitamin D deficiency.

Authors:  Ken Batai; Zuxi Cui; Amit Arora; Ebony Shah-Williams; Wenndy Hernandez; Maria Ruden; Courtney M P Hollowell; Stanley E Hooker; Madhavi Bathina; Adam B Murphy; Carolina Bonilla; Rick A Kittles
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2021-02-18       Impact factor: 5.917

8.  Sex, receptors, and attachment: a review of individual factors influencing response to oxytocin.

Authors:  Kai S Macdonald
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2013-01-10       Impact factor: 4.677

9.  Coevolution of male and female mate choice can destabilize reproductive isolation.

Authors:  Thomas G Aubier; Hanna Kokko; Mathieu Joron
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-11-12       Impact factor: 14.919

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.