Literature DB >> 9924334

Randomised prospective masked study comparing patient comfort following the instillation of topical proxymetacaine and amethocaine.

T Shafi1, P Koay.   

Abstract

AIMS: To evaluate the claim that topical proxymetacaine produces little or no discomfort on instillation by comparing it against topical amethocaine.
METHODS: This randomised, masked, double blind, prospective study involved 53 consecutive patients. Each patient received one drop of amethocaine 0.5% in one eye and one drop of proxymetacaine 0.5% in the other. The duration of the stinging sensation and degree of discomfort (using descriptive and a linear analogue method) for each topical anaesthetic was assessed.
RESULTS: The mean duration of stinging was 3.2 seconds for proxymetacaine and 22.1 seconds for amethocaine the difference being statistical significant (p < 0.001). The mean descriptive discomfort score was 2.6 for proxymetacaine and 14.2 for amethocaine (p = 0.01). The mean linear analogue score was 5.8 for proxymetacaine and 35.6 for amethocaine (p < 0.001). Proxymetacaine had a successful tonometry rate of 93% and amethocaine 98%.
CONCLUSION: This clinical study confirms that proxymetacaine is more comfortable on instillation than amethocaine. Minimising unnecessary patient discomfort is not only ideal, but encourages cooperation in apprehensive patients especially in children.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9924334      PMCID: PMC1722420          DOI: 10.1136/bjo.82.11.1285

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0007-1161            Impact factor:   4.638


  3 in total

1.  Graphic representation of pain.

Authors:  J Scott; E C Huskisson
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1976-06       Impact factor: 6.961

2.  Pain reduction in local anesthetic administration through pH buffering.

Authors:  R A Christoph; L Buchanan; K Begalla; S Schwartz
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 5.721

3.  A comparison of proparacaine and tetracaine eye anesthetics.

Authors:  J M Bartfield; T J Holmes; N Raccio-Robak
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  1994 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.451

  3 in total
  7 in total

1.  [Self-medication with local anaesthetics by glaucoma patients using teletonometry].

Authors:  G Schäffner; S Antal; C Jürgens; F Tost
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 1.059

2.  A comparative study of proxymetacaine-fluorescein and lignocaine-fluorescein use during applanation tonometry.

Authors:  W Birchall; V Kumar
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  Comparison of buffered and unbuffered local anaesthesia for inguinal hernia repair: a prospective study.

Authors:  E L Ball; P Sanjay; A Woodward
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2006-01-20       Impact factor: 4.739

4.  Pain perception with pH buffered peribulbar anaesthesia: a pilot study.

Authors:  M C Minasian; A C Ionides; R Fernando; C C Davey
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 4.638

5.  Considerations in glaucoma therapy: fixed combinations versus their component medications.

Authors:  Eve J Higginbotham
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-02-02

6.  The effect of cold tetracaine on the severity of burning sensation upon instillation.

Authors:  Wiwan Sansanayudh; Thitima Phansucharitthai; Nakarin Sansanayudh
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-11-20

7.  Precipitants of 5-Fluorouracil in Trabeculectomy Bleb Management: A Comparative Laboratory Study.

Authors:  Karl J Mercieca; Cecilia H Fenerty; Laura R Steeples; Brett Drury; Archana Bhargava
Journal:  J Curr Glaucoma Pract       Date:  2018-08-01
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.