Literature DB >> 9924012

No threshold dose for estradiol-induced sex reversal of turtle embryos: how little is too much?

D M Sheehan1, E Willingham, D Gaylor, J M Bergeron, D Crews.   

Abstract

Risk assessments for nongenotoxic chemicals assume a threshold below which no adverse outcomes are seen. However, when an endogenous chemical, such as 17ss-estradiol (E2), occurs at a concentration sufficient to cause an effect, the threshold is already exceeded. Under these circumstances, exogenous estradiol is not expected to provide a threshold dose. This principle is demonstrated for E2 in the red-eared slider, a turtle with temperature-dependent sex determination. In this species, gonadal sex is determined by egg incubation temperature; female development requires endogenous estrogen produced by elevated temperature. While normal production of females by endogenous estrogens is not an adverse effect, exogenous estrogens can sex reverse presumptive males, which can be an adverse effect. A large dose-response study was conducted using seven doses and a vehicle control (starting n = 300/group); a single E2 dose was applied to the eggshell of recently laid eggs. Animals were sexed after hatching. The incubation temperature chosen, 28.6 degrees C, generates a minority of females. Thus, the criteria for testing the threshold hypothesis were met, i.e., there is evidence that there is endogenous estrogen and that it generates an irreversible response. The lowest E2 dose tested, 400 pg/egg (40 ng/kg), sex reversed 14.4% of the animals, demonstrating very low dose sensitivity. The data were fit with a modified Michaelis-Menten equation, which provided an estimate of 1.7 ng/egg for endogenous estradiol. The median effective dose (ED50) was 5.0 +/- 2.0 ng/egg (95% confidence limits), of which 1.7 ng/egg was endogenous estradiol and 3.3 ng/egg came from the applied estradiol. There was no apparent threshold dose for E2. A smaller replication confirmed these results. These results provide a simple biologically based dose-response model and suggest that chemicals which act mechanistically like E2 may also show no threshold dose. If so, even low environmental concentrations of such chemicals may carry risk for sex reversal.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 9924012      PMCID: PMC1566346          DOI: 10.1289/ehp.99107155

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Health Perspect        ISSN: 0091-6765            Impact factor:   9.031


  21 in total

1.  Estrogenic activity of coumestrol and related compounds.

Authors:  E M BICKOFF; A L LIVINGSTON; A N BOOTH
Journal:  Arch Biochem Biophys       Date:  1960-06       Impact factor: 4.013

2.  Estrogen and sex reversal in turtles: a dose-dependent phenomenon.

Authors:  D Crews; J J Bull; T Wibbels
Journal:  Gen Comp Endocrinol       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 2.822

3.  The threshold dose question in teratogenesis.

Authors:  D W Gaylor; D M Sheehan; J F Young; D R Mattison
Journal:  Teratology       Date:  1988-10

Review 4.  Research to strengthen the scientific basis for health risk assessment: a survey of the context and rationale for mechanistically based methods and models.

Authors:  K Sexton; L W Reiter; H Zenick
Journal:  Toxicology       Date:  1995-09-01       Impact factor: 4.221

5.  Temperature-dependent sex determination in reptiles: proximate mechanisms, ultimate outcomes, and practical applications.

Authors:  D Crews; J M Bergeron; J J Bull; D Flores; A Tousignant; J K Skipper; T Wibbels
Journal:  Dev Genet       Date:  1994

6.  Incorporation of background in dose-response models.

Authors:  D G Hoel
Journal:  Fed Proc       Date:  1980-01

7.  DDT-induced feminization of gull embryos.

Authors:  D M Fry; C K Toone
Journal:  Science       Date:  1981-08-21       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Estrogenic activity of o,p'-DDT in the mammalian uterus and avian oviduct.

Authors:  J Bitman; H C Cecil; S J Harris; G F Fries
Journal:  Science       Date:  1968-10-18       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Developmental toxicity of 2,4,5-trichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4,5-T). II. Multireplicated dose-response studies with technical and analytical grades of 2,4,5-T in four-way outcross mice.

Authors:  C J Nelson; J F Holson; T B Gaines; J B LaBorde; W F McCallum; G L Wolff; D M Sheehan; J F Young
Journal:  Fundam Appl Toxicol       Date:  1992-08

10.  Chronology and morphology of temperature-dependent sex determination.

Authors:  T Wibbels; J J Bull; D Crews
Journal:  J Exp Zool       Date:  1991-12
View more
  25 in total

Review 1.  Hormones and endocrine-disrupting chemicals: low-dose effects and nonmonotonic dose responses.

Authors:  Laura N Vandenberg; Theo Colborn; Tyrone B Hayes; Jerrold J Heindel; David R Jacobs; Duk-Hee Lee; Toshi Shioda; Ana M Soto; Frederick S vom Saal; Wade V Welshons; R Thomas Zoeller; John Peterson Myers
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 19.871

2.  Endocrine-disrupting chemicals and public health protection: a statement of principles from The Endocrine Society.

Authors:  R Thomas Zoeller; T R Brown; L L Doan; A C Gore; N E Skakkebaek; A M Soto; T J Woodruff; F S Vom Saal
Journal:  Endocrinology       Date:  2012-06-25       Impact factor: 4.736

3.  Policy decisions on endocrine disruptors should be based on science across disciplines: a response to Dietrich et al.

Authors:  A C Gore; J Balthazart; D Bikle; D O Carpenter; D Crews; P Czernichow; E Diamanti-Kandarakis; R M Dores; D Grattan; P R Hof; A N Hollenberg; C Lange; A V Lee; J E Levine; R P Millar; R J Nelson; M Porta; M Poth; D M Power; G S Prins; E C Ridgway; E F Rissman; J A Romijn; P E Sawchenko; P D Sly; O Söder; H S Taylor; M Tena-Sempere; H Vaudry; K Wallen; Z Wang; L Wartofsky; C S Watson
Journal:  Endocrinology       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 4.736

Review 4.  Developmental programming and endocrine disruptor effects on reproductive neuroendocrine systems.

Authors:  Andrea C Gore
Journal:  Front Neuroendocrinol       Date:  2008-03-05       Impact factor: 8.606

Review 5.  Estrogens in the wrong place at the wrong time: Fetal BPA exposure and mammary cancer.

Authors:  Tessie Paulose; Lucia Speroni; Carlos Sonnenschein; Ana M Soto
Journal:  Reprod Toxicol       Date:  2014-09-30       Impact factor: 3.143

Review 6.  Chlorinated persistent organic pollutants, obesity, and type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Duk-Hee Lee; Miquel Porta; David R Jacobs; Laura N Vandenberg
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  2014-01-31       Impact factor: 19.871

7.  Environmental sex determination in a reptile varies seasonally and with yolk hormones.

Authors:  R M Bowden; M A Ewert; C E Nelson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2000-09-07       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Cadmium alters the reproductive endocrine disruption and enhancement of growth in the early and adult stages of Oreochromis mossambicus.

Authors:  C Amutha; P Subramanian
Journal:  Fish Physiol Biochem       Date:  2012-08-19       Impact factor: 2.794

9.  Does area deprivation modify the association between exposure to a nitrate and low-dose atrazine metabolite mixture in drinking water and small for gestational age? A historic cohort study.

Authors:  F Limousi; M Albouy-Llaty; C Carles; A Dupuis; S Rabouan; V Migeot
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2013-06-16       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 10.  Endocrine-disrupting chemicals: an Endocrine Society scientific statement.

Authors:  Evanthia Diamanti-Kandarakis; Jean-Pierre Bourguignon; Linda C Giudice; Russ Hauser; Gail S Prins; Ana M Soto; R Thomas Zoeller; Andrea C Gore
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 19.871

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.