Literature DB >> 9923470

How children change their minds: strategy change can be gradual or abrupt.

M W Alibali1.   

Abstract

This study investigated patterns of change in children's strategies for solving mathematical equivalence problems. The strategies children expressed in speech and in gesture were assessed both before and after an instructional intervention. In the intervention, children received either no input, accuracy feedback, or feedback plus instruction about a principle, an analogy, or a procedure. From pretest to posttest, many children changed both the variability of their strategy use and the content of their strategy repertoires. Patterns of change depended on type of instruction and on children's initial level of variability. Children who received instruction were especially likely to generate new strategies, and children with high variability were especially likely to abandon prior strategies. Gradual change was most common; however, many children modified their repertoires abruptly. Abrupt strategy change was especially prevalent among children who received procedure-based instruction and among children with low initial variability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 9923470     DOI: 10.1037//0012-1649.35.1.127

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dev Psychol        ISSN: 0012-1649


  7 in total

1.  Does training mental rotation transfer to gains in mathematical competence? Assessment of an at-home visuospatial intervention.

Authors:  Chi-Ngai Cheung; Jenna Y Sung; Stella F Lourenco
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2019-05-29

2.  Knowledge of mathematical equivalence in children with specific language impairment: insights from gesture and speech.

Authors:  Elina Mainela-Arnold; Martha W Alibali; Kristin Ryan; Julia L Evans
Journal:  Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch       Date:  2010-08-02       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  EQUATIONS AND THE EQUAL SIGN IN ELEMENTARY MATHEMATICS TEXTBOOKS.

Authors:  Sarah R Powell
Journal:  Elem Sch J       Date:  2012-06

4.  Children's confidence using incorrect strategies on mathematical equivalence problems.

Authors:  Amanda Grenell; Lindsey J Nelson; Bailey Gardner; Emily R Fyfe
Journal:  Cogn Dev       Date:  2022-02-26

5.  An eye for relations: eye-tracking indicates long-term negative effects of operational thinking on understanding of math equivalence.

Authors:  Dana L Chesney; Nicole M McNeil; James R Brockmole; Ken Kelley
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2013-10

6.  Redescription disembeds relations: evidence from relational transfer and use in problem solving.

Authors:  James A Dixon; Matthew C Dohn
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2003-10

7.  Unraveling the contribution of left-right language on spatial perspective taking.

Authors:  Linda Abarbanell; Peggy Li
Journal:  Spat Cogn Comput       Date:  2020-10-05
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.