M Tuntiprawon1. 1. Faculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Abstract
STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Retention and marginal adaptation factors have major influence on the failure of cemented complete veneer crowns. PURPOSE: This study investigated the effect of axial surface roughness on the marginal seating and retention of silver-palladium crowns luted with zinc phosphate, glass ionomer, and resin cements. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Coarse and fine diamond stones were used to create various surface roughnesses of premolars. A milling machine was used to control the height and angle of the axial walls of tooth preparations. Ten cast metal crowns in 6 subgroups were luted with 3 cements (Phosphacap, Fuji Cap I, and Panavia 21). Marginal seating was recorded with a Digimatic indicator. Retention was determined by measuring the tensile force required to remove a metal crown with a Lloyd testing machine. RESULTS: Two-way analysis of variance revealed statistically significant differences (P <.001) in retention for both luting cements and surface roughness. No significant difference was recorded for marginal seating relative to roughness (P =.860) and interaction effects (P =.204). Tukey-HSD tests revealed substantial differences in retention among Phosphacap, Fuji Cap I, and Panavia 21 cements. Significant differences were not confirmed in marginal seating between Fuji Cap I and Phosphacap cements with coarse diamonds, and Phosphacap and Panavia 21 cements with fine diamonds. CONCLUSIONS: The best retention for complete metal crown was demonstrated for tooth preparations ground with coarse diamonds and cemented with Panavia 21 cement. Differences in axial surface roughness had no effect on the marginal seating of the complete metal crowns.
RCT Entities:
STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Retention and marginal adaptation factors have major influence on the failure of cemented complete veneer crowns. PURPOSE: This study investigated the effect of axial surface roughness on the marginal seating and retention of silver-palladium crowns luted with zinc phosphate, glass ionomer, and resin cements. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Coarse and fine diamond stones were used to create various surface roughnesses of premolars. A milling machine was used to control the height and angle of the axial walls of tooth preparations. Ten cast metal crowns in 6 subgroups were luted with 3 cements (Phosphacap, Fuji Cap I, and Panavia 21). Marginal seating was recorded with a Digimatic indicator. Retention was determined by measuring the tensile force required to remove a metal crown with a Lloyd testing machine. RESULTS: Two-way analysis of variance revealed statistically significant differences (P <.001) in retention for both luting cements and surface roughness. No significant difference was recorded for marginal seating relative to roughness (P =.860) and interaction effects (P =.204). Tukey-HSD tests revealed substantial differences in retention among Phosphacap, Fuji Cap I, and Panavia 21 cements. Significant differences were not confirmed in marginal seating between Fuji Cap I and Phosphacap cements with coarse diamonds, and Phosphacap and Panavia 21 cements with fine diamonds. CONCLUSIONS: The best retention for complete metal crown was demonstrated for tooth preparations ground with coarse diamonds and cemented with Panavia 21 cement. Differences in axial surface roughness had no effect on the marginal seating of the complete metal crowns.