Literature DB >> 9922421

Initial experience using the Food and Drug administration guidelines for emergency research without consent.

M S Kremers1, D R Whisnant, L S Lowder, L Gregg.   

Abstract

Beginning November 6, 1996, Food and Drug Administration regulation 21 CFR 50.24 has allowed research without consent in limited circumstances while requiring additional patient protection in the form of community consultation and disclosure. We report our experience in complying with these regulations in Multicenter Vest CPR protocol, the first investigational device study done under this new ruling. We found uncertainty in inter-pretation of the requirements for community consultation. The acceptance of research without consent varied among the parties exposed to this protocol, but neither physicians nor the lay public expressed major reservations. The consultation process was time-consuming, demanding, and relatively costly. Further clarification of the community consultation standard and additional dialogue on this important topic will help to foster additional research in cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 9922421     DOI: 10.1016/s0196-0644(99)70399-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Emerg Med        ISSN: 0196-0644            Impact factor:   5.721


  12 in total

1.  Presumed consent in emergency neonatal research.

Authors:  D J Manning
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 2.903

2.  A qualitative study of institutional review board members' experience reviewing research proposals using emergency exception from informed consent.

Authors:  Katie B McClure; Nicole M Delorio; Terri A Schmidt; Gary Chiodo; Paul Gorman
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 2.903

3.  Community consultation and public disclosure: preliminary results from a new model.

Authors:  Cornelia A Ramsey; Bonnie Quearry; Elizabeth Ripley
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2011-07-05       Impact factor: 3.451

4.  Patients' experiences of intervention trials on the treatment of myocardial infarction: is it time to adjust the informed consent procedure to the patient's capacity?

Authors:  A Agård; G Hermerén; J Herlitz
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 5.994

5.  Exploring ethical conflicts in emergency trauma research: the COMBAT (Control of Major Bleeding after Trauma) study experience.

Authors:  Theresa L Chin; Ernest E Moore; Marilyn E Coors; James G Chandler; Arsen Ghasabyan; Jeffrey N Harr; John R Stringham; Christopher R Ramos; Sarah Ammons; Anirban Banerjee; Angela Sauaia
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2014-10-14       Impact factor: 3.982

6.  Stroke patients' preferences and values about emergency research.

Authors:  C E Blixen; G J Agich
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 2.903

7.  Medical research in clinical emergency settings in Europe.

Authors:  S Lötjönen
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.903

8.  The random dialing survey as a tool for community consultation for research involving the emergency medicine exception from informed consent.

Authors:  Eileen M Bulger; Terri A Schmidt; Andrea J Cook; Karen J Brasel; Denise E Griffiths; Peter J Kudenchuk; Daniel Davis; Berit Bardarson; Ahamed H Idris; Tom P Aufderheide
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2008-09-27       Impact factor: 5.721

9.  Patients' perceptions of research in emergency settings: a study of survivors of sudden cardiac death.

Authors:  Neal W Dickert; Nancy E Kass
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2008-11-10       Impact factor: 4.634

Review 10.  Meeting unique requirements: Community consultation and public disclosure for research in emergency setting using exception from informed consent.

Authors:  Neal W Dickert; Kathleen Metz; Michael D Fetters; Adrianne N Haggins; Deneil K Harney; Candace D Speight; Robert Silbergleit
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 5.221

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.