Literature DB >> 9921987

Is there a diagnostic role for bone scanning of patients with a high pretest probability for metastatic renal cell carcinoma?

A Staudenherz1, B Steiner, S Puig, F Kainberger, T Leitha.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The utility of performing whole-body bone scintigraphy (BS) as part of a routine staging workup for patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is currently being debated. This study investigated the diagnostic performance of BS in 36 patients with a high pretest probability for bone metastases due to abnormal laboratory tests, pain, or confirmed nonosseous metastases.
METHODS: Planar whole-body BS was performed in all patients 3 hours after the intravenous injection of 555 MBq (15 mCi) of technetium-99m-3,3-diphosphono-1,2-propane dicarboxylic acid tetrasodium salt).
RESULTS: In 14 of 36 patients, bone metastases could be confirmed either due to computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging (n=11) or open site directed biopsy (n=3), respectively. The sensitivity ranged from 10% to 60%, depending on the applied visual threshold. The extent of the metastatic involvement was underestimated in all cases. No diagnostic pattern of tracer accumulation, clinical features, or laboratory tests was identified as enhancing the sensitivity for the detection of bone metastases in this population.
CONCLUSIONS: The authors concluded that, even among preselected patients, BS has no diagnostic role in RCC and should therefore be omitted from the clinical workup.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 9921987

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  7 in total

1.  Unusual skeletal metastases from myxoid liposarcoma only detectable by MR imaging.

Authors:  Takahiro Ishii; Takafumi Ueda; Akira Myoui; Noriyuki Tamai; Noboru Hosono; Hideki Yoshikawa
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Thyroid autoantibodies, telomerase activity, vascular endothelial growth factor, and bone scanning.

Authors:  A van Ophoven; B Patel; M K Rauch; A Belldegrun
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  1999

3.  Imaging techniques as predictive and prognostic biomarkers in renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Paul Nathan; Anup Vinayan
Journal:  Ther Adv Med Oncol       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 8.168

Review 4.  Current Challenges in Diagnosis and Assessment of the Response of Locally Advanced and Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Alberto Diaz de Leon; Ali Pirasteh; Daniel N Costa; Payal Kapur; Hans Hammers; James Brugarolas; Ivan Pedrosa
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2019-06-14       Impact factor: 5.333

Review 5.  Molecular imaging of the kidneys.

Authors:  Zsolt Szabo; Nada Alachkar; Jinsong Xia; William B Mathews; Hamid Rabb
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.446

6.  Glycolysis on F-18 FDG PET/CT Is Superior to Amino Acid Metabolism on C-11 Methionine PET/CT in Identifying Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma at Staging.

Authors:  Suk-Hyun Lee; Jee-Soo Park; Hyunjeong Kim; Dongwoo Kim; Seung-Hwan Lee; Won-Sik Ham; Woong-Kyu Han; Young-Deuk Choi; Mijin Yun
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 6.639

Review 7.  Imaging Advances in the Management of Kidney Cancer.

Authors:  Katherine M Krajewski; Ivan Pedrosa
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 44.544

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.