Literature DB >> 9921788

Concept maps: a strategy to teach and evaluate critical thinking.

B J Daley1, C R Shaw, T Balistrieri, K Glasenapp, L Piacentine.   

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to describe a study that implemented concept maps as a methodology to teach and evaluate critical thinking. Students in six senior clinical groups were taught to use concept maps. Students created three concept maps over the course of the semester. Data analysis demonstrated a group mean score of 40.38 on the first concept map and 135.55 on the final concept map, for a difference of 98.16. The paired t value comparing the first concept map to the final concept map was -5.69. The data indicated a statistically significant difference between the first and final maps. This difference is indicative of the students' increase in conceptual and critical thinking.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 9921788     DOI: 10.3928/0148-4834-19990101-12

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nurs Educ        ISSN: 0148-4834            Impact factor:   1.726


  12 in total

1.  Problem-Based Learning in Entry-Level Athletic Training Professional-Education Programs: A Model for Developing Critical-Thinking and Decision-Making Skills.

Authors:  Kristinn I Heinrichs
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.860

2.  Use of concept maps to promote electrocardiogram diagnosis learning in undergraduate medical students.

Authors:  Ruimin Dong; Xiaoyan Yang; Bangrong Xing; Zihao Zou; Zhenda Zheng; Xujing Xie; Jieming Zhu; Lin Chen; Hanjian Zhou
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-05-15

3.  Does the mind map learning strategy facilitate information retrieval and critical thinking in medical students?

Authors:  Anthony V D'Antoni; Genevieve Pinto Zipp; Valerie G Olson; Terrence F Cahill
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2010-09-16       Impact factor: 2.463

Review 4.  A multidisciplinary systematic review of the use of diagrams as a means of collecting data from research subjects: application, benefits and recommendations.

Authors:  Muriah J Umoquit; Peggy Tso; Helen E D Burchett; Mark J Dobrow
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2011-01-27       Impact factor: 4.615

5.  Example-based learning: comparing the effects of additionally providing three different integrative learning activities on physiotherapy intervention knowledge.

Authors:  Joseph-Omer Dyer; Anne Hudon; Katherine Montpetit-Tourangeau; Bernard Charlin; Sílvia Mamede; Tamara van Gog
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2015-03-07       Impact factor: 2.463

Review 6.  A meta-analysis of the effects of non-traditional teaching methods on the critical thinking abilities of nursing students.

Authors:  JuHee Lee; Yoonju Lee; SaeLom Gong; Juyeon Bae; Moonki Choi
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 2.463

7.  Role of concept map in teaching general awareness and pharmacotherapy of HIV/AIDS among second professional medical students.

Authors:  Suman Bala; D C Dhasmana; Juhi Kalra; Saurabh Kohli; Taruna Sharma
Journal:  Indian J Pharmacol       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 1.200

8.  Effectiveness of a Low-Cost, Graduate Student-Led Intervention on Study Habits and Performance in Introductory Biology.

Authors:  Tyler D Hoskins; J D Gantz; Blake R Chaffee; Kel Arlinghaus; James Wiebler; Michael Hughes; Joyce J Fernandes
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 3.325

9.  Interrater reliability of the mind map assessment rubric in a cohort of medical students.

Authors:  Anthony V D'Antoni; Genevieve Pinto Zipp; Valerie G Olson
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2009-04-28       Impact factor: 2.463

10.  Fostering clinical reasoning in physiotherapy: comparing the effects of concept map study and concept map completion after example study in novice and advanced learners.

Authors:  Katherine Montpetit-Tourangeau; Joseph-Omer Dyer; Anne Hudon; Monica Windsor; Bernard Charlin; Sílvia Mamede; Tamara van Gog
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 2.463

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.