Literature DB >> 9921390

Effectiveness of ignition interlock devices in reducing drunk driving recidivism.

J H Coben1, G L Larkin.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine if ignition interlock devices reduce driving while intoxicated (DWI) recidivism. SEARCH STRATEGIES: Cochrane Collaboration search strategies were used. SELECTION CRITERIA: Studies for selection examined the effectiveness of interlock programs in a defined population. Studies were required to have a clear description of the program and outcomes evaluated, to have a comparison group and to provide interpretable data. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: A total of 31 studies were found. Ten studies met the selection criteria. Three of these studies were eliminated from further analysis because they did not contain original data. A fourth study was eliminated due to methodologic weaknesses, leaving six studies for final review and analysis. Pooled analyses were not done because studies did not follow similar methods over comparable time periods. MAIN
RESULTS: Five of the six studies found interlocks were effective in reducing DWI recidivism while the interlock was installed in the car. In the five studies demonstrating a significant effect, participants in the interlock programs were 15%-69% less likely than controls to be re-arrested for DWI. The only reported randomized, controlled trial demonstrated a 65% reduction in re-arrests for DWI in the interlock group, compared with the control group.
CONCLUSIONS: Alcohol ignition interlock programs appear to be effective in reducing DWI recidivism during the time period when the interlock is installed in the car. Future studies should attempt to control for exposure (i.e., number of miles driven) and determine if certain sub-groups are most benefited by interlock programs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 9921390     DOI: 10.1016/s0749-3797(98)00117-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Prev Med        ISSN: 0749-3797            Impact factor:   5.043


  10 in total

Review 1.  What are the most effective ways of improving population health through transport interventions? Evidence from systematic reviews.

Authors:  D S Morrison; M Petticrew; H Thomson
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.710

2.  Crash types: markers of increased risk of alcohol-involved crashes among teen drivers.

Authors:  C Raymond Bingham; Jean T Shope; Julie E Parow; Trivellore E Raghunathan
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol Drugs       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 2.582

3.  Impact of State Ignition Interlock Laws on Alcohol-Involved Crash Deaths in the United States.

Authors:  Elinore J Kaufman; Douglas J Wiebe
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2016-03-17       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Modeling the injury prevention impact of mandatory alcohol ignition interlock installation in all new US vehicles.

Authors:  Patrick M Carter; Carol A C Flannagan; C Raymond Bingham; Rebecca M Cunningham; Jonathan D Rupp
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 5.  Alcohol ignition interlock programmes for reducing drink driving recidivism.

Authors:  C Willis; S Lybrand; N Bellamy
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2004-10-18

6.  Estimating driver risk using alcohol biomarkers, interlock blood alcohol concentration tests and psychometric assessments: initial descriptives.

Authors:  Paul Marques; Scott Tippetts; John Allen; Martin Javors; Christer Alling; Michel Yegles; Fritz Pragst; Friedrich Wurst
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2009-11-16       Impact factor: 6.526

7.  The impact of interlock installation on driving behavior and drinking behavior related to driving.

Authors:  Thomas H Nochajski; Amy R Manning; Robert Voas; Eileen P Taylor; Michael Scherer; Eduardo Romano
Journal:  Traffic Inj Prev       Date:  2020-08-12       Impact factor: 1.491

8.  Changes in Alcohol Use and Drinking and Driving Outcomes From Before Arrest for Driving Under the Influence to After Interlock Removal.

Authors:  Robert B Voas; Anthony Scott Tippetts; Eduardo Romano; Thomas H Nochajski; Amy R Manning; Eileen Taylor; Michael Scherer
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2021-03-12       Impact factor: 3.455

9.  Using Rural⁻Urban Continuum Codes (RUCCS) to Examine Alcohol-Related Motor Vehicle Crash Injury and Enforcement in New York State.

Authors:  Joyce C Pressley; Leah M Hines; Michael J Bauer; Shin Ah Oh; Joshua R Kuhl; Chang Liu; Bin Cheng; Matthew F Garnett
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-04-15       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  A Latent Class Analysis of DUI Offender Motivation and Awareness as Predictors of Performance While on Alcohol Ignition Interlocks.

Authors:  Michael Scherer; Kenneth Beck; Eileen P Taylor; Ann Romosz; Robert Voas; Eduardo Romano
Journal:  J Subst Use       Date:  2020-08-18
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.