Literature DB >> 9918642

Attitudes and compliance of pre-adolescent children during early treatment of Class II malocclusion.

P D Johnson1, D A Cohen, L Aiosa, S McGorray, T Wheeler.   

Abstract

A survey was administered to 168 parents and their children at the end of mixed dentition treatment for Class II correction utilizing bionators and headgears to investigate attitudes of parents and patients toward bionators and headgears and to elicit factors associated with compliance. Directional differences between parent and child responses occurred frequently with agreement ranging from 41 to 100%, averaging 69% overall. The results indicate that the orthodontic patient population has medical and dental health as a priority. While parental and child reasons for seeking treatment may be different, it appears that both groups seek care for perceived benefits of health, decreased present and future oral problems, peer influences, and dental self image improvement. Additionally, children who are undergoing treatment perceive that others do not understand what they are going through, they may be embarrassed, and some may break their appliances to annoy the parent or orthodontist. Pain, decreased ability to speak, and difficulty chewing were reported to decrease appliance wear. Patient understanding of the treatment goals was reported to increase compliance. The bionator caused more instances of speech problems and associated non-compliance than the headgear. The headgear caused more instances of pain, but did not cause significantly less associated compliance than the bionator. The results suggest that bolstering the patient-orthodontist relationship, informing the patient about the treatment goals, methods, and their individual role, and offering immediate short term rewards can potentially increase patient compliance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9918642     DOI: 10.1111/ocr.1998.1.1.20

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthod Res        ISSN: 1397-5927


  5 in total

1.  Patients' and Parents' Perception of Functional Appliances: A Survey Study.

Authors:  Yağmur Lena; Aylin Paşaoğlu Bozkurt; Enver Yetkiner
Journal:  Turk J Orthod       Date:  2017-06-01

Review 2.  Orthodontic treatment for prominent upper front teeth (Class II malocclusion) in children and adolescents.

Authors:  Klaus Bsl Batista; Badri Thiruvenkatachari; Jayne E Harrison; Kevin D O'Brien
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-03-13

3.  Acceptance of orthodontic miniscrews as temporary anchorage devices.

Authors:  Khalid H Zawawi
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2014-06-30       Impact factor: 2.711

4.  The impact of general self-efficacy and the severity of malocclusion on acceptance of removable orthodontic appliances in 10- to 12-year-old patients.

Authors:  Navid Naseri; Tahereh Baherimoghadam; Niloofar Bassagh; Shahram Hamedani; Elmira Bassagh; Zahra Hashemi
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2020-11-30       Impact factor: 2.757

Review 5.  The impact of orthodontic treatment on the quality of life a systematic review.

Authors:  Yu Zhou; Yi Wang; XiuYing Wang; Gerald Volière; RongDang Hu
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2014-06-10       Impact factor: 2.757

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.