Literature DB >> 9918619

The role of conversion in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: Do predictive factors exist?

O Schwandner1, T H Schiedeck, H Bruch.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study was performed to analyze the reasons for conversion of laparoscopic colorectal procedures to open surgery and to identify risk factors.
METHODS: All patients who underwent laparoscopic colorectal surgery at our institution were enrolled in a prospective trial. The causes of conversion were analyzed. Statistical analysis, including a logistic regression model, was performed to identify factors that would predict an increased risk of conversion.
RESULTS: A total of 300 laparoscopic or laparoscopic-assisted procedures for both benign and malignant diseases were performed within 5 years. Mean patient age was 61.4 years (range, 17-93). There were 218 women and 82 men. Major complications occurred in 8.6%, and 30-day-mortality rate was 1.1%. Postoperative hospitalization was 13.9 days (range, 6-47). Conversion occurred in 22 cases (7.3%). The mean age of the converted group was 64.7 years (range, 31-93). Postoperative hospital stay was 15.0 days (range, 10-25). The main reasons for conversion to open surgery were inflammation, obesity, anesthetic problems, technical difficulties, intraoperative complications, and intraoperative decisions concerning oncological resection. The conversion rate was 14.6% in patients who underwent sigmoid resection for diverticular disease. By univariate analysis, statistically significant factors defining a higher risk of conversion were male gender (p = 0.0029), age from 55 to 64 years (p = 0.0015), extreme body status (p = 0.0001), and diagnosis of diverticular disease (p = 0.0011). According to the logistic regression model, all four factors combined would give a probability of conversion of 70.3%.
CONCLUSIONS: The risk factors contributing to the possibility of conversion included male gender, age between 55 and 64 years, extreme body status, and diverticular disease. Using these data, patients with an increased likelihood of conversion can be identified. However, if conversion is necessary, laparoscopic colorectal surgery can be safely applied to the patients with no additional morbidity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 9918619     DOI: 10.1007/s004649900927

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  46 in total

1.  Converted laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

Authors:  P Gervaz; A Pikarsky; M Utech; M Secic; J Efron; B Belin; A Jain; S Wexner
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-05-11       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Conversion in laparoscopic-assisted colectomy for right colon cancer: risk factors and clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Jimmy C M Li; Janet F Y Lee; Simon S M Ng; Raymond Y C Yiu; Sophie S F Hon; Wing Wa Leung; Ka Lau Leung
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Laparoscopic colectomy for recurrent and complicated diverticulitis: a prospective study of 396 patients.

Authors:  O Schwandner; S Farke; F Fischer; C Eckmann; T H K Schiedeck; H-P Bruch
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2004-02-17       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 4.  Outcome of laparoscopic colorectal surgery in obese and nonobese patients: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yanming Zhou; Lupeng Wu; Xiudong Li; Xiurong Wu; Bin Li
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-10-20       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Impact of previous abdominal surgery on the outcome of laparoscopic colectomy: a case-matched control study.

Authors:  A Vignali; S Di Palo; P De Nardi; G Radaelli; E Orsenigo; C Staudacher
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2007-08-03       Impact factor: 3.781

6.  Considerations on the learning curve for laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a view from the bottom.

Authors:  S Leong; R A Cahill; B J Mehigan; R B Stephens
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2007-04-03       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  What is the definition of "conversion" in laparoscopic colorectal surgery?

Authors:  Sherief Shawki; Badma Bashankaev; Paula Denoya; Christina Seo; Eric G Weiss; Steven D Wexner
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-03-06       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Influence of conversion on the perioperative and oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer compared with primarily open resection.

Authors:  Alexander Rickert; Florian Herrle; Fabian Doyon; Stefan Post; Peter Kienle
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-08-13       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Single-port laparoscopic colorectal resections in obese patients are as safe and effective as conventional laparoscopy.

Authors:  Erman Aytac; Matthias Turina; Emre Gorgun; Luca Stocchi; Feza H Remzi; Meagan M Costedio
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-05-23       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Laparoscopy in Crohn's disease.

Authors:  Murali N Naidu; Alfred C Trang; Barry A Salky
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2007-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.