Literature DB >> 9918484

Would you say you "had sex" if...?

S A Sanders1, J M Reinisch.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: The current public debate regarding whether oral sex constitutes having "had sex" or sexual relations has reflected a lack of empirical data on how Americans as a population define these terms.
OBJECTIVE: To determine which interactions individuals would consider as having "had sex."
METHODS: A question was included in a survey conducted in 1991 that explored sexual behaviors and attitudes among a random stratified sample of 599 students representative of the undergraduate population of a state university in the Midwest. PARTICIPANTS: The participants originated from 29 states, including all 4 US Census Bureau geographic regions. Approximately 79% classified themselves as politically moderate to conservative. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Percentage of respondents who believed the interaction described constituted having "had sex."
RESULTS: Individual attitudes varied regarding behaviors defined as having "had sex": 59% (95% confidence interval, 54%-63%) of respondents indicated that oral-genital contact did not constitute having "had sex" with a partner. Nineteen percent responded similarly regarding penile-anal intercourse.
CONCLUSIONS: The findings support the view that Americans hold widely divergent opinions about what behaviors do and do not constitute having "had sex."

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 9918484     DOI: 10.1001/jama.281.3.275

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  60 in total

1.  The JAMA firing.

Authors:  M Shuchman
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1999-04

Review 2.  Measuring sexual behaviour: methodological challenges in survey research.

Authors:  K A Fenton; A M Johnson; S McManus; B Erens
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.519

3.  On editorial freedom: implications of the JAMA affair.

Authors:  M Mckee; C Alvarez-Dardet
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 3.710

4.  Science, sex and semantics: the firing of George Lundberg.

Authors:  J Hoey; C E Caplan; T Elmslie; K M Flegel; K S Joseph; A Palepu; A M Todkill
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1999-02-23       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  Medical editors, journal owners, and the sacking of George Lundberg.

Authors:  S W Fletcher; R H Fletcher
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  How does the United States compare with the rest of the world in human sexual behavior?

Authors:  J Mackay
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  2001-06

7.  Editorial independence at medical journals owned by professional associations: a survey of editors.

Authors:  Ronald M Davis; Marcus Müllner
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.525

8.  Number of recent sexual partners among blood donors in Brazil: associations with donor demographics, donation characteristics, and infectious disease markers.

Authors:  Giuseppina Maria Patavino; Cesar de Almeida-Neto; Jing Liu; David J Wright; Alfredo Mendrone-Junior; Maria Inês Lopes Ferreira; Anna Bárbara de Freitas Carneiro; Brian Custer; João Eduardo Ferreira; Michael P Busch; Ester Cerdeira Sabino
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2011-07-14       Impact factor: 3.157

9.  Test-retest reliability of self-reported HIV/STD-related measures among African-American adolescents in four U.S. cities.

Authors:  Peter A Vanable; Michael P Carey; Jennifer L Brown; Ralph J DiClemente; Laura F Salazar; Larry K Brown; Daniel Romer; Robert F Valois; Michael Hennessy; Bonita F Stanton
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2008-11-20       Impact factor: 5.012

10.  Variations in coital and noncoital sexual repertoire among adolescent women.

Authors:  Devon J Hensel; J Dennis Fortenberry; Donald P Orr
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2007-10-04       Impact factor: 5.012

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.