Literature DB >> 9916922

Multiple mutation analyses in single tumor cells with improved whole genome amplification.

W Dietmaier1, A Hartmann, S Wallinger, E Heinmöller, T Kerner, E Endl, K W Jauch, F Hofstädter, J Rüschoff.   

Abstract

Combining whole genome amplification (WGA) methods with novel laser-based microdissection techniques has made it possible to exploit recent progress in molecular knowledge of cancer development and progression. However, WGA of one or a few cells has not yet been optimized and systematically evaluated for samples routinely processed in tumor pathology. We therefore studied the value of established WGA protocols in comparison to an improved PEP (I-PEP) PCR method in defined numbers of flow-sorted and microdissected tumor cells obtained both from frozen as well as formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded tissue sections. In addition, the feasibility of I-PEP-PCR for mutation analysis was tested using clusters of 50-100 unfixed tumor cells obtained by touch preparation of ten breast carcinomas by conventional sequencing of exon 7 and 8 of the p53 gene. Finally, immunocytochemically stained microdissected single disseminated tumor cells from bone marrow aspirates were investigated with respect to mutations in codon 12 of Ki-ras by restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP)-PCR after I-PEP-PCR. The modified I-PEP-PCR protocol was superior to the original PEP-PCR and DOP-PCR protocols concerning amplification of DNA from one cell (efficiency rate I-PEP-PCR 40% versus PEP-PCR 15% and DOP-PCR 30%) and five cells (efficiency rate I-PEP-PCR 100% versus PEP-PCR 33% and DOP-PCR 20%). Preamplification by I-PEP allowed 100% sequence accuracy in > 4000 sequenced base pairs and Ki-ras mutation detection in isolated single disseminated tumor cells. For reliable microsatellite analysis of I-PEP-preamplified DNA, at least 10 unfixed cells from fluorescence-activated cell sorting, 10 cells from frozen tissue, or at least 30 cells from formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded tissue sections were required. Thus, I-PEP-PCR allowed multiple reliable microsatellite analyses suited for microsatellite instability and losses of heterozygosity and mutation analysis even at the single cell level, rendering this technique a powerful new tool for molecular analyses in diagnostic and experimental tumor pathology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 9916922      PMCID: PMC1853424          DOI: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)65254-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Pathol        ISSN: 0002-9440            Impact factor:   4.307


  55 in total

1.  Specific genetic analysis of microscopic tissue after selective ultraviolet radiation fractionation and the polymerase chain reaction.

Authors:  D Shibata; D Hawes; Z H Li; A M Hernandez; C H Spruck; P W Nichols
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 4.307

2.  Mismatch amplification mutation assay (MAMA): application to the c-H-ras gene.

Authors:  R S Cha; H Zarbl; P Keohavong; W G Thilly
Journal:  PCR Methods Appl       Date:  1992-08

3.  Deletion mutagenesis during polymerase chain reaction: dependence on DNA polymerase.

Authors:  N F Cariello; W G Thilly; J A Swenberg; T R Skopek
Journal:  Gene       Date:  1991-03-01       Impact factor: 3.688

4.  Degenerate oligonucleotide-primed PCR: general amplification of target DNA by a single degenerate primer.

Authors:  H Telenius; N P Carter; C E Bebb; M Nordenskjöld; B A Ponder; A Tunnacliffe
Journal:  Genomics       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 5.736

5.  Whole genome amplification from a single cell: implications for genetic analysis.

Authors:  L Zhang; X Cui; K Schmitt; R Hubert; W Navidi; N Arnheim
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1992-07-01       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Analysis of tumour-specific alterations in native specimens by PCR.

Authors:  M Bohm; I Wieland
Journal:  Int J Oncol       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 5.650

7.  Direct sequencing from touch preparations of human carcinomas: analysis of p53 mutations in breast carcinomas.

Authors:  J S Kovach; R M McGovern; J D Cassady; S K Swanson; L E Wold; B Vogelstein; S S Sommer
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1991-07-17       Impact factor: 13.506

8.  Comparative genomic hybridization for molecular cytogenetic analysis of solid tumors.

Authors:  A Kallioniemi; O P Kallioniemi; D Sudar; D Rutovitz; J W Gray; F Waldman; D Pinkel
Journal:  Science       Date:  1992-10-30       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Cytogenetic analysis by chromosome painting using DOP-PCR amplified flow-sorted chromosomes.

Authors:  H Telenius; A H Pelmear; A Tunnacliffe; N P Carter; A Behmel; M A Ferguson-Smith; M Nordenskjöld; R Pfragner; B A Ponder
Journal:  Genes Chromosomes Cancer       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 5.006

10.  Pattern of p53 gene mutations in breast cancers of women of the midwestern United States.

Authors:  S S Sommer; J Cunningham; R M McGovern; S Saitoh; J J Schroeder; L E Wold; J S Kovach
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1992-02-19       Impact factor: 13.506

View more
  59 in total

Review 1.  Laser capture microscopy.

Authors:  S Curran; J A McKay; H L McLeod; G I Murray
Journal:  Mol Pathol       Date:  2000-04

2.  Delivery and storage of single embryos, sperm, or cells in microglass capillaries.

Authors:  Min-Kang Wang; Ji-Long Liu; Li Lian; Da-Yuan Chen
Journal:  In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 2.416

3.  A new molecular approach to investigate origin and formation of structural chromosome aberrations.

Authors:  B Röthlisberger; A Schinzel; D Kotzot
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 5.239

4.  Quantitative evaluation by minisequencing and microarrays reveals accurate multiplexed SNP genotyping of whole genome amplified DNA.

Authors:  Lovisa Lovmar; Mona Fredriksson; Ulrika Liljedahl; Snaevar Sigurdsson; Ann-Christine Syvänen
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-11-01       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  SCOMP is superior to degenerated oligonucleotide primed-polymerase chain reaction for global amplification of minute amounts of DNA from microdissected archival tissue samples.

Authors:  Nikolas H Stoecklein; Andreas Erbersdobler; Oleg Schmidt-Kittler; Joachim Diebold; Julian A Schardt; Jakob R Izbicki; Christoph A Klein
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 4.307

6.  Correlation of beta-catenin localization with cyclooxygenase-2 expression and CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP) in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Takako Kawasaki; Katsuhiko Nosho; Mutsuko Ohnishi; Yuko Suemoto; Gregory J Kirkner; Reiko Dehari; Jeffrey A Meyerhardt; Charles S Fuchs; Shuji Ogino
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 5.715

7.  Comparative study of the haplotype structure and linkage disequilibrium of chromosome 1p36.2 region in the Korean and Japanese populations.

Authors:  Tamao Akesaka; Seong-Gene Lee; Jun Ohashi; Makoto Bannai; Naoyuki Tsuchiya; Yongsook Yoon; Katsushi Tokunaga; Kyuyoung Song
Journal:  J Hum Genet       Date:  2004-10-06       Impact factor: 3.172

8.  Alterations in p53 predict response to preoperative high dose chemotherapy in patients with gastric cancer.

Authors:  F Bataille; P Rümmele; W Dietmaier; D Gaag; F Klebl; A Reichle; P Wild; F Hofstädter; A Hartmann
Journal:  Mol Pathol       Date:  2003-10

9.  Genome-wide detection of single-nucleotide and copy-number variations of a single human cell.

Authors:  Chenghang Zong; Sijia Lu; Alec R Chapman; X Sunney Xie
Journal:  Science       Date:  2012-12-21       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Sensitive and specific KRAS somatic mutation analysis on whole-genome amplified DNA from archival tissues.

Authors:  Ronald van Eijk; Marjo van Puijenbroek; Amiet R Chhatta; Nisha Gupta; Rolf H A M Vossen; Esther H Lips; Anne-Marie Cleton-Jansen; Hans Morreau; Tom van Wezel
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2009-12-03       Impact factor: 5.568

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.