Literature DB >> 9916190

Functional fracture bracing.

A Sarmiento1, L L Latta.   

Abstract

Functional bracing is an effective therapeutic modality in the management of selected fractures of the tibia, humerus, and ulna, particularly low-energy injuries. In the case of tibial fractures, it is applicable only to reduced transverse fractures and to axially unstable fractures with an acceptable degree of shortening. The rate of union of tibial fractures after functional bracing is approximately 97%. The initial shortening noted with closed tibial fractures rarely increases with weight bearing. Shortening has been reported to be as little as 12 mm in 95% of patients, with angulation of 8 degrees in 90%. Such minimal shortening and angulation do not affect functional results. In closed and type I open diaphyseal humeral fractures treated with functional braces, the nonunion rate is approximately 3%. Most of the reported residual angular deformities have been functionally and cosmetically acceptable. For isolated ulnar fractures, the nonunion rate is approximately 2%. Functional fracture bracing is predicated on the premise that motion at the fracture site encourages osteogenesis. The method is applicable only to selected fractures, and it is necessary to have a clear understanding of its rationale, indications, and technique.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 9916190     DOI: 10.5435/00124635-199901000-00007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg        ISSN: 1067-151X            Impact factor:   3.020


  5 in total

Review 1.  Plate fixation or intramedullary fixation of humeral shaft fractures.

Authors:  David J Heineman; Rudolf W Poolman; Sean E Nork; Kees-Jan Ponsen; Mohit Bhandari
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.717

2.  [Humeral diaphyseal fractures: functional bracing].

Authors:  A Sarmiento; L L Latta
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 1.000

3.  Local soft tissue compression enhances fracture healing in a rabbit fibula.

Authors:  Simon Morr; Ernest C Chisena; Emre Tomin; Michael Mangino; Joseph M Lane
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2009-11-13

4.  Risk factors for infection after 46,113 intramedullary nail operations in low- and middle-income countries.

Authors:  Sven Young; Stein Atle Lie; Geir Hallan; Lewis G Zirkle; Lars B Engesæter; Leif I Havelin
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Protrusive maxillomandibular fixation for intracapsular condylar fracture: a report of two cases.

Authors:  Yeong Kon Jeong; Won-Jong Park; Il Kyung Park; Gi Tae Kim; Eun Joo Choi
Journal:  J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2017-10-26
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.