Literature DB >> 9915330

Increasing isoflurane from 0.9 to 1.1 minimum alveolar concentration minimally affects dorsal horn cell responses to noxious stimulation.

J F Antognini1, E Carstens.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The spinal cord appears to be the site at which isoflurane suppresses movement that occurs in response to a noxious stimulus. In an attempt to localize its site of suppressant action, the authors determined the effect of isoflurane on dorsal horn neuronal responses to supramaximal noxious stimulation at end-tidal concentrations that just permitted and just prevented movement.
METHODS: Rats (n = 14) were anesthetized with isoflurane, and after lumbar laminectomy, the minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) for each rat was determined using a supramaximal mechanical stimulus. In these same rats, after extracellular microelectrode placement in the lumbar spinal cord, dorsal horn neuronal responses to the supramaximal stimulus were determined at the concentrations of isoflurane that bracketed each rat's MAC (0.1% higher and lower than MAC). The MAC of isoflurane was then re-determined.
RESULTS: Dorsal horn neuronal response was 1,757+/-892 impulses/min at 0.9 MAC and 1,508+/-988 impulses/min at 1.1 MAC, a 14% decrease (P < 0.05). Cell responses varied, with some cells increasing their response at the higher concentration of isoflurane. The MAC of isoflurane was 1.38+/-0.2% before and 1.34+/-0.2% after determination of dorsal horn neuronal responses.
CONCLUSIONS: Isoflurane, at concentrations that bracket MAC, has a variable and minimal depressant effect on dorsal horn cell responses to noxious mechanical stimulation. These data suggest that the major action of isoflurane to suppress movement evoked by a noxious stimulus might occur primarily at a site other than the dorsal horn.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 9915330     DOI: 10.1097/00000542-199901000-00027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesthesiology        ISSN: 0003-3022            Impact factor:   7.892


  8 in total

1.  Volatile anesthetic effects on midbrain-elicited locomotion suggest that the locomotor network in the ventral spinal cord is the primary site for immobility.

Authors:  Steven L Jinks; Milo Bravo; Shawn G Hayes
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 7.892

2.  4-bromopropofol decreases action potential generation in spinal neurons by inducing a glycine receptor-mediated tonic conductance.

Authors:  V S Eckle; C Grasshoff; V Mirakaj; P M O'Neill; N G Berry; M Leuwer; B Antkowiak
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 8.739

3.  Rat dorsal horn nociceptive-specific neurons are more sensitive than wide dynamic range neurons to depression by immobilizing doses of volatile anesthetics: an effect partially reversed by the opioid receptor antagonist naloxone.

Authors:  Linda S Barter; Earl E Carstens; Steven L Jinks; Joseph F Antognini
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 5.108

Review 4.  Is a new paradigm needed to explain how inhaled anesthetics produce immobility?

Authors:  Edmond I Eger; Douglas E Raines; Steven L Shafer; Hugh C Hemmings; James M Sonner
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 5.108

Review 5.  Putative Roles of Astrocytes in General Anesthesia.

Authors:  Daniel K Mulkey; Michelle L Olsen; Mengchan Ou; Colin M Cleary; Guizhi Du
Journal:  Curr Neuropharmacol       Date:  2022       Impact factor: 7.708

6.  Sparing effect of robenacoxib on the minimum alveolar concentration for blunting adrenergic response (MAC-BAR) of sevoflurane in dogs.

Authors:  Jun Tamura; Takaharu Itami; Tomohito Ishizuka; Sho Fukui; Norihiko Ooyama; Kenjiro Miyoshi; Tadashi Sano; Kazuto Yamashita
Journal:  J Vet Med Sci       Date:  2013-09-04       Impact factor: 1.267

7.  Interaction between maropitant and carprofen on sparing of the minimum alveolar concentration for blunting adrenergic response (MAC-BAR) of sevoflurane in dogs.

Authors:  Sho Fukui; Norihiko Ooyama; Jun Tamura; Mohammed Ahmed Umar; Tomohito Ishizuka; Takaharu Itami; Kenjiro Miyoshi; Tadashi Sano; Kazuto Yamashita
Journal:  J Vet Med Sci       Date:  2017-01-21       Impact factor: 1.267

8.  A randomized controlled trial comparing the myocardial protective effects of isoflurane with propofol in patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass surgery on cardiopulmonary bypass, assessed by changes in N-terminal brain natriuretic peptide.

Authors:  Balaji Kuppuswamy; Kirubakaran Davis; Raj Sahajanandan; Manickam Ponniah
Journal:  Ann Card Anaesth       Date:  2018 Jan-Mar
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.