Literature DB >> 9915304

Sexual dimorphism in the face of Australopithecus africanus.

C A Lockwood1.   

Abstract

Recently discovered crania of Australopithecus africanus from Sterkfontein Member 4 and Makapansgat enlarge the size range of the species and encourage a reappraisal of both the degree and pattern of sexual dimorphism. Resampling methodology (bootstrapping) is used here to establish that A. africanus has a greater craniofacial size range than chimpanzees or modern humans, a range which is best attributed to a moderately high degree of sexual dimorphism. Compared to other fossil hominins, this variation is similar to that of Homo habilis (sensu lato) but less than that of A. boisei. The finding of moderately high dimorphism is corroborated by a CV-based estimate and ratios between those specimens considered to be male and those considered to be female. Inferences about the pattern of craniofacial dimorphism in the A. africanus face currently rely on the relationship of morphology and size. Larger specimens, particularly Stw 505, show prominent superciliary eminences and glabellar regions, but in features related in part to canine size, such as the curvature of the infraorbital surface, large and small specimens of A. africanus are similar. In this respect, the pattern resembles that of modern humans more so than chimpanzees or lowland gorillas. A. africanus may also show novel patterns of sexual dimorphism when compared to extant hominines, such as in the form of the anterior pillar. However, males of the species do not exhibit characteristics of more derived hominins, such as A. robustus.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 9915304     DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-8644(199901)108:1<97::AID-AJPA6>3.0.CO;2-O

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol        ISSN: 0002-9483            Impact factor:   2.868


  5 in total

1.  Sexual size dimorphism, canine dimorphism, and male-male competition in primates: where do humans fit in?

Authors:  J Michael Plavcan
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2012-03

2.  Sexual dimorphism in Australopithecus afarensis was similar to that of modern humans.

Authors:  Philip L Reno; Richard S Meindl; Melanie A McCollum; C Owen Lovejoy
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-07-23       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  A cephalometric study of skulls from the Bahriyah oasis.

Authors:  Moushira Erfan Zaki; Muhammad Al-Tohamy Soliman; Hala T El-Bassyouni
Journal:  J Forensic Dent Sci       Date:  2012-07

4.  Assessing sources of error in comparative analyses of primate behavior: Intraspecific variation in group size and the social brain hypothesis.

Authors:  Aaron A Sandel; Jordan A Miller; John C Mitani; Charles L Nunn; Samantha K Patterson; László Zsolt Garamszegi
Journal:  J Hum Evol       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 3.656

5.  Biometric evidence that sexual selection has shaped the hominin face.

Authors:  Eleanor M Weston; Adrian E Friday; Pietro Liò
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2007-08-08       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.