Literature DB >> 9915190

Anatomic basis and clinical implications for nasal tip support in open versus closed rhinoplasty.

W P Adams1, R J Rohrich, L H Hollier, J Minoli, L K Thornton, I Gyimesi.   

Abstract

Successful rhinoplasty depends on nasal tip support and its influence on nasal tip projection. The factors involved in nasal tip support are numerous; however, the role of the anterior septum versus the lower lateral cartilages has been debated in the literature. The purpose of this study was to quantitate, using fresh cadavers, the critical elements for nasal tip support with open versus closed rhinoplasty techniques. Multiple nasal manipulations, including cephalic trim, cephalic trim and interruption of the lower lateral cartilages, dorsal hump resection (1 to 4 mm), submucous resection of the septum, and complete septal removal, were performed using fresh cadaver heads and using both the open and closed rhinoplasty approach. Changes in nasal tip support were recorded. In comparing similar procedures, the mean loss of tip projection for the open approach was 3.43 mm versus 1.98 mm for the closed approach (p < 0.001). There was a significantly larger loss of tip projection in open versus closed procedures for cephalic trim, cephalic trim and interruption of the lower lateral cartilages, and cephalic trim with interruption of the lower lateral cartilages and septum removal (p < 0.001, 0.001, and 0.001, respectively). We attributed the differences between the open and closed approaches to the increases in ligamentous disruption and skin undermining that occur when using the open approach. Septum manipulation in general resulted in larger losses in tip support in both the open and closed approach. We conclude that the open approach for rhinoplasty results in a significantly increased loss of tip projection when compared with the closed technique due to the larger disruption of ligamentous support. Contrary to previous data, septal manipulation resulted in significant losses of tip projection, most likely secondary to lowering the nasal septal angle, and this effect may be more significant in closed rhinoplasty. The apparent clinical implications are that active measures, such as columellar struts and/or suture techniques for adding or maintaining nasal tip support during rhinoplasty, are indicated, especially when using the open approach and when any anterior septal alteration is performed using the open or endonasal approach.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 9915190     DOI: 10.1097/00006534-199901000-00040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  12 in total

1.  [Rhinoplasty: open or closed technique?].

Authors:  A Berghaus
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  Does the open rhinoplasty incision decrease nasal projection?

Authors:  Berna Uslu Coskun; Esra Sozen; Sureyya Seneldir; Ilknur Ozkaya; Omursen Yildirim; Arzu Yasemin Korkut; Burhan Dadas
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-09-17       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Westernization of the asian nose by augmentation of the retropositioned anterior nasal spine with an injectable filler.

Authors:  Yohei Tanaka; Kiyoshi Matsuo; Shunsuke Yuzuriha
Journal:  Eplasty       Date:  2011-02-16

4.  Uses of Various Grafting Techniques in External Approach Rhinoplasty: An Overview.

Authors:  Nazir A Khan; Ayaz Rehman; Rajshri Yadav
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2016-06-27

5.  L-shaped columellar strut in East asian nasal tip plasty.

Authors:  Eun-Sang Dhong; Yeon-Jun Kim; Man Koon Suh
Journal:  Arch Plast Surg       Date:  2013-09-13

6.  Autologous vs Irradiated Homologous Costal Cartilage as Graft Material in Rhinoplasty.

Authors:  Jee Hye Wee; Sue Jean Mun; Woo Sung Na; Heejin Kim; Joo Hyun Park; Dong-Kyu Kim; Hong-Ryul Jin
Journal:  JAMA Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 4.611

7.  Rhinoplasty - indications and techniques.

Authors:  Abel-Jan Tasman
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2008-03-14

8.  Risks and complications in rhinoplasty.

Authors:  Gerhard Rettinger
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2008-03-14

9.  Nasal Sculpting: Calculated and Predictable Tip Elevation With Cephalic Trim.

Authors:  Jeremiah S Redstone; Saeed Chowdhry; Jonathan Nguyen; Durham Alan North; Ron Hazani; Brad Drury; Eric M Yoder; Ross D Cooperman; Virginia Yoder; Jarrod A Little; Larry D Florman; Bradon J Wilhelmi
Journal:  Eplasty       Date:  2015-06-01

10.  Clinical study of graft selection in malaysian rhinoplasty patients.

Authors:  Balwant Singh Gendeh
Journal:  ISRN Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-09-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.