Literature DB >> 9915167

Deep inferior epigastric perforator flap in breast reconstruction: experience with the first 50 flaps.

M Hamdi1, E M Weiler-Mithoff, M H Webster.   

Abstract

Abdominal wall function is a major concern for plastic surgeons performing breast reconstruction with TRAM flaps. The deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) free flap spares the whole rectus abdominis muscle, includes skin and fat only, and therefore, preserves adequate abdominal wall competence. Between January of 1995 and May of 1997, a total of 50 breast reconstructions in 42 patients were performed by using the DIEP flap. Eight patients had bilateral procedures. Five breast reconstructions were immediate and 45 were delayed. All patients were collected prospectively and no patients were excluded from this study. The average age of patients was 47 years (range, 22 to 59 years) and the average weight was 65 kg (range, 51 to 103 kg). Seventy percent of patients had one or more risk factors for TRAM flap reconstruction. The mean postoperative follow-up period was 13 months (range, 3 to 30 months). Twenty consecutive patients (17 single and 3 bilateral DIEP flap breast reconstructions) within this group underwent evaluation of their abdominal wall function preoperatively and then 3 and 6 months postoperatively by using Lacote's muscle grading system. Average flap harvesting time was 120 minutes and average blood loss was 420 cc. Total flap loss and partial necrosis occurred in one (2 percent) and three flaps (6 percent), respectively. Abdominal wound infection occurred in seven patients (17 percent). Unfortunately, one patient died of adult respiratory distress syndrome on the seventh postoperative day. Fat necrosis was found in three flaps (6 percent). Postoperative abdominal wall examination did not reveal any hernia, but bulging was found in two patients (5 percent). All patients were able to resume their daily activities. Abdominal wall function tests in the series of 20 patients showed that all patients had reached or even improved their preoperative level of upper and lower rectus muscle function 6 months after the operation. The external oblique muscles were the most affected by the procedure of flap harvesting, but only two patients (10 percent) were found to have a measurable impairment after 6 months. Patient satisfaction with the reconstructed breast and the donor site was rated high. The free DIEP flap is, therefore, a reliable and valuable method of breast reconstruction. The donor site morbidity was decreased, and the more tedious flap dissection did not affect the overall outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 9915167     DOI: 10.1097/00006534-199901000-00015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  30 in total

1.  Breast reconstruction in private practice.

Authors:  Steven M Pisano; Peter R Ledoux; Chet L Nastala
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.314

2.  Perforator flaps in head and neck reconstruction.

Authors:  Jagdeep S Chana; Joy Odili
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.314

3.  Should Immediate Autologous Breast Reconstruction Be Considered in Women Who Require Postmastectomy Radiation Therapy? A Prospective Analysis of Outcomes.

Authors:  Jessica Billig; Reshma Jagsi; Ji Qi; Jennifer B Hamill; Hyungjin M Kim; Andrea L Pusic; Edward Buchel; Edwin G Wilkins; Adeyiza O Momoh
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 4.730

4.  A comparison of the superficial inferior epigastric artery flap and deep inferior epigastric perforator flap in postmastectomy reconstruction: A cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Achilleas Thoma; Leigh Jansen; Sheila Sprague; Eric Duku P Stat
Journal:  Can J Plast Surg       Date:  2008

5.  Update on Breast Reconstruction Using Free TRAM, DIEP, and SIEA Flaps.

Authors:  Pierre M Chevray
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.314

6.  Deep inferior epigastric artery perforated rectus abdominis free flap for head and neck reconstruction.

Authors:  Johnny Cappiello; Cesare Piazza; Valentina Taglietti; Piero Nicolai
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-08-25       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  Comparisons Between Normal Body Mass Index and Overweight Patients Who Underwent Unilateral Microsurgical Breast Reconstructions.

Authors:  Ming-Huei Cheng; Satomi Koide; Courtney Chen; Yi-Ling Lin
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-09-08       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 8.  Choice of flaps for breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Masahiro Tachi; Atsushi Yamada
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.402

9.  Breast reconstruction with autologous tissue following mastectomy.

Authors:  Hr Teymouri; S Stergioula; M Eder; L Kovacs; E Biemer; Na Papadopulos
Journal:  Hippokratia       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 0.471

Review 10.  The role of the physiotherapy in the plastic surgery patients after oncological breast surgery.

Authors:  Luiz Felipe Nevola Teixeira; Fabio Sandrin
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2014-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.