OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relative strengths and weaknesses of interactive and delayed teleconsultations in otolaryngology. SETTING:Ambulatory clinic at an urban tertiary care facility. SUBJECTS:Forty-five adult patients with known or suspected upper aerodigestive tract pathology. INTERVENTION: Patients were interviewed by an otolaryngology chief resident (CR) using a standardized protocol; the results were presented to a board-certified otolaryngologist present locally (LBCO) and a remote physician viewing the encounter by video-conferencing elsewhere in the hospital (RBCO). The CR performed a complete otolaryngologic examination, including fiberoptic nasopharyngolaryngoscopy. The CR and LBCO viewed the examination on a video monitor; the RBCO viewed the same image on the video-conferencing monitor. Each physician independently recorded findings and rendered a diagnosis. A third board-certified otolaryngologist, who reviewed the stored data file (text and stored images) in a delayed fashion (DBCO), documented his findings and made a diagnosis. RESULTS: The CR and LBCO agreed on diagnosis in 92% (36 of 39) of cases. The LBCO and RBCO arrived at the same diagnosis in 29 of 34 (85%) cases. The DBCO agreed with the LBCO for 18 of 28 (64%) diagnoses. Agreement on management recommendations between the LBCO/DBCO pair were also lower than for the LBCO/RBCO pair. CONCLUSIONS: Both interactive and delayed techniques can be used to provide relatively accurate clinical consultations in otolaryngology. Telemedicine can be applied for subspecialty consultations, screening programs, remote emergency triage, second opinions, and resident education.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relative strengths and weaknesses of interactive and delayed teleconsultations in otolaryngology. SETTING: Ambulatory clinic at an urban tertiary care facility. SUBJECTS: Forty-five adult patients with known or suspected upper aerodigestive tract pathology. INTERVENTION: Patients were interviewed by an otolaryngology chief resident (CR) using a standardized protocol; the results were presented to a board-certified otolaryngologist present locally (LBCO) and a remote physician viewing the encounter by video-conferencing elsewhere in the hospital (RBCO). The CR performed a complete otolaryngologic examination, including fiberoptic nasopharyngolaryngoscopy. The CR and LBCO viewed the examination on a video monitor; the RBCO viewed the same image on the video-conferencing monitor. Each physician independently recorded findings and rendered a diagnosis. A third board-certified otolaryngologist, who reviewed the stored data file (text and stored images) in a delayed fashion (DBCO), documented his findings and made a diagnosis. RESULTS: The CR and LBCO agreed on diagnosis in 92% (36 of 39) of cases. The LBCO and RBCO arrived at the same diagnosis in 29 of 34 (85%) cases. The DBCO agreed with the LBCO for 18 of 28 (64%) diagnoses. Agreement on management recommendations between the LBCO/DBCO pair were also lower than for the LBCO/RBCO pair. CONCLUSIONS: Both interactive and delayed techniques can be used to provide relatively accurate clinical consultations in otolaryngology. Telemedicine can be applied for subspecialty consultations, screening programs, remote emergency triage, second opinions, and resident education.
Authors: Katherine Z Xie; Luis A Antezana; Andrew J Bowen; Linda X Yin; Sarah Yeakel; Ashley Nassiri; Eric J Moore Journal: J Telemed Telecare Date: 2022-06-06 Impact factor: 6.344
Authors: Jonathan R Mallen; Manan Udayan Shah; Ryan Drake; Kathryn Kreicher; Todd Falcone; Nicholas Karter; Scott Schoem; Christopher Grindle; Stephen Wolfe; Chia-Ling Kuo; Jinjian Mu; Seth Lotterman; Gregory Bonaiuto Journal: JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 2020-10-01 Impact factor: 6.223
Authors: Phoebe Elizabeth Riley; Jakob L Fischer; Ryan E Nagy; Nora L Watson; Edward D McCoul; Anthony M Tolisano; Charles A Riley Journal: OTO Open Date: 2021-01-08