Literature DB >> 9914148

ATP reception and chemosensory adaptation in Tetrahymena thermophila.

.   

Abstract

Micromolar concentrations of adenosine triphosphate (ATP) and its non-hydrolyzable analog &bgr;- &ggr; -methylene ATP are both effective depolarizing chemorepellents in Tetrahymena thermophila. Chemorepellent behavior consists of repeated bouts of backward swimming (avoidance reactions) that can easily be quantified to provide a convenient bioassay for purinergic reception studies. Chemosensory adaptation occurs following prolonged exposure (10 min) to the repellents, and cells regain normal swimming behavior. Adaptation is specific since cells that are behaviorally adapted to either ATP or &bgr;- &ggr; -methylene ATP still retain full responsiveness to the chemorepellents GTP and lysozyme. However, cross adaptation occurs between ATP and &bgr;- &ggr; -methylene ATP, suggesting that they involve the same receptor. Behavioral sensitivity to both ATP and &bgr;- &ggr; -methylene ATP is increased by the addition of Na+, but addition of either Ca2+ or Mg2+ dramatically decreases the response to ATP. These ionic effects are correlated with in vivo ATP hydrolysis, suggesting that divalent ions decrease purinergic sensitivity by activating a Ca2+- or Mg2+-dependent ecto-ATPase to hydrolyze the ATP signal. In vivo [32P]ATP binding studies and Scatchard analysis suggest that the behavioral adaptation is due to a decrease in the number of surface binding sites, as represented by decreased Bmax values. All these changes are reversible (de-adaptation) after 12 min in a repellent-free buffer. Electrophysiological analysis showed that both &bgr;- &ggr; -methylene ATP (10 micromol l-1) and ATP (500 micromol l-1) elicited sustained, reversible depolarizations while GTP (10 micromol l-1) produced a transient depolarization, suggesting that the chemosensory response pathways for ATP and GTP reception may differ. There may be separate ATP and GTP receptors since ATP and GTP responses do not cross-adapt and 'cold' (unlabeled) GTP is not a good inhibitor of [32P]ATP binding. These results suggests that T. thermophila possess high-affinity surface receptors for ATP that are down-regulated during chemosensory adaptation. These ATP receptors may act as chemorepellent receptors to enable T. thermophila to recognize recently lysed cells and avoid a possibly deleterious situation. This is the simplest eukaryotic organism to show an electrophysiological response to external ATP.

Entities:  

Year:  1999        PMID: 9914148     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.202.4.407

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  7 in total

1.  Biochemical evidence for a P2Y-like receptor in Tetrahymena thermophila.

Authors:  B N Rosner; J N Bartholomew; C D Gaines; M L Riddle; H A Everett; K G Rulapaugh; L E Nickerson; M R Marshall; H G Kuruvilla
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2003-09-06       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 2.  Basal release of ATP: an autocrine-paracrine mechanism for cell regulation.

Authors:  Ross Corriden; Paul A Insel
Journal:  Sci Signal       Date:  2010-01-12       Impact factor: 8.192

3.  GTP avoidance in Tetrahymena thermophila requires tyrosine kinase activity, intracellular calcium, NOS, and guanylyl cyclase.

Authors:  Janine Bartholomew; Johnathan Reichart; Romie Mundy; Jacquelyn Recktenwald; Shannon Keyser; Mark Riddle; Heather Kuruvilla
Journal:  Purinergic Signal       Date:  2007-02-24       Impact factor: 3.765

4.  Responses of the ciliates Tetrahymena and Paramecium to external ATP and GTP.

Authors:  Todd M Hennessey
Journal:  Purinergic Signal       Date:  2005-03-17       Impact factor: 3.765

5.  Signal transduction events induced by extracellular guanosine 5' triphosphate in excitable cells.

Authors:  T Pietrangelo; S Guarnieri; S Fulle; G Fanò; M A Mariggiò
Journal:  Purinergic Signal       Date:  2006-07-26       Impact factor: 3.765

6.  Netrin-1 Peptide Is a Chemorepellent in Tetrahymena thermophila.

Authors:  Heather Kuruvilla; Bradley Schmidt; Stephanie Song; Marian Bhajjan; Matthew Merical; Caleb Alley; Christopher Griffin; David Yoder; Josephine Hein; Daniel Kohl; Cambria Puffenberger; David Petroff; Elise Newcomer; Kortney Good; Graham Heston; Anna Hurtubise
Journal:  Int J Pept       Date:  2016-03-31

Review 7.  ATPe Dynamics in Protozoan Parasites. Adapt or Perish.

Authors:  Natalia Lauri; Zaher Bazzi; Cora L Alvarez; María F Leal Denis; Julieta Schachter; Vanesa Herlax; Mariano A Ostuni; Pablo J Schwarzbaum
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2018-12-27       Impact factor: 4.096

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.