Literature DB >> 989579

Fallibility of urine drug screens in monitoring methadone programs.

E Gottheil, G R Caddy, D L Austin.   

Abstract

Urine specimens containing five different drugs, each at three levels of concentration with zero to five drugs in a specimen, were sent to two "approved" laboratories. In only 46.9% and 13.8%, respectively, were all drugs present correctly identified and no false-positive results reported. With some allowances, the results improved to 53.8% and 49.4%. If these tests are to be continued then (1) the fallibility of these tests should be known by all treatment personnel, (2) laboratories should be licensed rather than merely approved, and (3) maintenance of the license should be made contingent on passing "blind" proficiency tests.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1976        PMID: 989579

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  3 in total

1.  Comparison of laboratory performance with blind and mail-distributed proficiency testing samples.

Authors:  L C LaMotte; G O Guerrant; D S Lewis; C T Hall
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1977 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.792

2.  [Results of analytical controls of the urine of drug addicts].

Authors:  T Vu Duc; A Vernay
Journal:  Soz Praventivmed       Date:  1979-08

3.  Clinical evaluation and use of urine screening for drug abuse.

Authors:  A J Saxon; D A Calsyn; V M Haver; C J Delaney
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1988-09
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.