Literature DB >> 9895060

Within-patient variability of myogenic motor-evoked potentials to multipulse transcranial electrical stimulation during two levels of partial neuromuscular blockade in aortic surgery.

E P van Dongen1, H T ter Beek, M A Schepens, W J Morshuis, H J Langemeijer, A de Boer, E H Boezeman.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Intraoperative recording of myogenic motor responses evoked by transcranial electrical stimulation (tcMEPs) is a method of assessing the integrity of the motor pathways during aortic surgery. To identify conditions for optimal spinal cord monitoring, we investigated the effects of manipulating the level of neuromuscular blockade (T1 response of the train-of-four (TOF) stimulation 5%-15% versus T1 response 45%-55% of baseline), as well as the number of transcranial pulses (two versus six stimuli) on the within-patient variability and amplitude of tcMEPs. Ten patients (30-76 yr) scheduled to undergo surgery on the thoracic and thoracoabdominal aorta were studied. After achieving a stable anesthetic state and before surgery, 10 tcMEPs were recorded from the right extensor digitorum communis muscle and the right tibialis anterior muscle in response to two-pulse and six-pulse transcranial electrical stimulation with an interstimulus interval of 2 ms during two levels of neuromuscular blockade. The right thenar eminence was used for recording the level of relaxation. The tcMEP amplitude using the six-pulse paradigm was larger (P < 0.01; leg and arm) compared with the amplitude evoked by two-pulse stimulation during both levels of relaxation. The within-patient variability, expressed as median coefficient of variation, was less when six-pulse stimulation was used. At a T1 response of 45%-55% of baseline, larger, less variable tcMEPs were recorded than at a T1 response of 5%-15%. Our results suggest that the best quality of tcMEP signals (tibialis anterior muscle) is obtained when the six-pulse paradigm is used with a stable level of muscle relaxation (the first twitch of the TOF-thenar eminence-at 45%-55% of baseline). IMPLICATIONS: This study shows that six-pulse (rather than two-pulse) transcranial electrical stimulation during a stable anesthetic state and a stable neuromuscular blockade aimed at 45%-55% (rather than 5%-15%) of baseline provides reliable and recordable muscle responses sufficiently robust for spinal cord monitoring in aortic surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 9895060     DOI: 10.1097/00000539-199901000-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  7 in total

Review 1.  Recent advances in the monitoring of myogenic motor-evoked potentials: development of post-tetanic motor-evoked potentials.

Authors:  Masahiko Kawaguchi; Hironobu Hayashi; Yuri Yamamoto; Hitoshi Furuya
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2008-11-15       Impact factor: 2.078

Review 2.  Muscle relaxant use during intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring.

Authors:  Tod B Sloan
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2012-09-27       Impact factor: 2.502

3.  Monitoring of motor evoked potentials with high intensity repetitive transcranial electrical stimulation during spinal surgery.

Authors:  Siavash S Haghighi
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 4.  Current approach on spinal cord monitoring: the point of view of the neurologist, the anesthesiologist and the spine surgeon.

Authors:  Thomas N Pajewski; Vincent Arlet; Lawrence H Phillips
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-07-10       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Effect of intraoperative muscle relaxation reversal on the success rate of motor-evoked potential recording in patients undergoing spinal surgery: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Minyu Jian; Bo Ma; Haiyang Liu; Chengwei Wang; Fa Liang; Yang Zhou; Hui Qiao; Ruquan Han
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-05-02       Impact factor: 3.006

6.  Anesthesia and evoked responses in neurosurgery.

Authors:  Suren Soghomonyan; Kenneth R Moran; Gurneet S Sandhu; Sergio D Bergese
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2014-04-14       Impact factor: 5.810

7.  The effects of propofol and isoflurane on intraoperative motor evoked potentials during spinal cord tumour removal surgery - A prospective randomised trial.

Authors:  Parthiban Velayutham; Verghese T Cherian; Vedantam Rajshekhar; Krothapalli S Babu
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2019-02
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.