G G Varnavas1, W Grand. 1. Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, State University of New York at Buffalo, New York, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: We undertook this anatomic study of the insula to investigate its vasculature, morphological features, and surrounding cortical relationships. METHODS: Under magnification of x2 to x32, 53 formalin-fixed, adult cadaver hemispheres were dissected. Overlying opercular landmarks were identified and used as guides to portions of the deeper insula. RESULTS: The insula has a complex venous system; 50 (94.3%) hemispheres exhibited a combination of superficial and deep venous connections. The venous connections divide the insular cortex into the following three anatomic zones, with some overlap: subapical region (insular pole), anterior lobe, and posterior lobe. Arterial contributions to the insula originated entirely from the middle cerebral artery, predominantly via the superior division. Thirty-six (67.9%) specimens exhibited a dedicated terminal vessel to the insula; in 34 of these (94.4%), this terminal vessel arose from the middle cerebral artery branch to the central sulcus. There was never more than one terminal vessel in each insular cortex. CONCLUSION: Historically, it has been reported that the insula drains primarily via the deep middle cerebral vein (DMCV). We found more complex (typically both superficial and deep) venous connections. In most specimens, the DMCV exhibited a direct venous connection to only a portion of the insular cortex. The deep drainage connections of the insula and the vessels that form the DMCV suggest that the DMCV drains primarily the lateral lenticular veins and secondarily the insula. Arterial contributions to the insula tended to be centered around the central insular sulcus, independent of the location of the middle cerebral artery bifurcation. Although the insular vascular anatomic features showed great variability, the anatomic and structural relationships described in this dissection series should facilitate safe surgical and endovascular interventions.
OBJECTIVE: We undertook this anatomic study of the insula to investigate its vasculature, morphological features, and surrounding cortical relationships. METHODS: Under magnification of x2 to x32, 53 formalin-fixed, adult cadaver hemispheres were dissected. Overlying opercular landmarks were identified and used as guides to portions of the deeper insula. RESULTS: The insula has a complex venous system; 50 (94.3%) hemispheres exhibited a combination of superficial and deep venous connections. The venous connections divide the insular cortex into the following three anatomic zones, with some overlap: subapical region (insular pole), anterior lobe, and posterior lobe. Arterial contributions to the insula originated entirely from the middle cerebral artery, predominantly via the superior division. Thirty-six (67.9%) specimens exhibited a dedicated terminal vessel to the insula; in 34 of these (94.4%), this terminal vessel arose from the middle cerebral artery branch to the central sulcus. There was never more than one terminal vessel in each insular cortex. CONCLUSION: Historically, it has been reported that the insula drains primarily via the deep middle cerebral vein (DMCV). We found more complex (typically both superficial and deep) venous connections. In most specimens, the DMCV exhibited a direct venous connection to only a portion of the insular cortex. The deep drainage connections of the insula and the vessels that form the DMCV suggest that the DMCV drains primarily the lateral lenticular veins and secondarily the insula. Arterial contributions to the insula tended to be centered around the central insular sulcus, independent of the location of the middle cerebral artery bifurcation. Although the insular vascular anatomic features showed great variability, the anatomic and structural relationships described in this dissection series should facilitate safe surgical and endovascular interventions.
Authors: Thomas P Naidich; Eugene Kang; Girish M Fatterpekar; Bradley N Delman; S Humayun Gultekin; David Wolfe; Orlando Ortiz; Indra Yousry; Martin Weismann; Tarek A Yousry Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2004-02 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Shervin Kamalian; Andre Kemmling; Roderick C Borgie; Livia T Morais; Seyedmehdi Payabvash; Ana M Franceschi; Shahmir Kamalian; Albert J Yoo; Karen L Furie; Michael H Lev Journal: Stroke Date: 2013-08-29 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Maria S M Wai; Chun Shi; W H Kwong; Lihong Zhang; Wai Ping Lam; David T Yew Journal: Histochem Cell Biol Date: 2008-09-02 Impact factor: 4.304
Authors: Paul M Macey; Paula Wu; Rajesh Kumar; Jennifer A Ogren; Heidi L Richardson; Mary A Woo; Ronald M Harper Journal: Auton Neurosci Date: 2012-02-17 Impact factor: 3.145
Authors: J Blustajn; S Krystal; D Taussig; S Ferrand-Sorbets; G Dorfmüller; M Fohlen Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2019-08-01 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Andreas Gutzeit; Dieter Meier; Johannes M Froehlich; Klaus Hergan; Sebastian Kos; Constantin V Weymarn; Kai Lutz; Dominik Ettlin; Christoph A Binkert; Jochen Mutschler; Sabine Sartoretti-Schefer; Mike Brügger Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2012-09-12 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Michael M Safaee; Dario J Englot; Seunggu J Han; Michael T Lawton; Mitchel S Berger Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2016-06-13 Impact factor: 4.130