PURPOSE: Evaluation of the impact, indications, and therapeutic efficiency of chest CT in intensive-care and emergency patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective assessment of 741 consecutive chest CT, or which 74% were acquired in the spiral technique, in intensive-care and emergency patients. Chest CT scans and respective clinical data were compared. RESULTS: 16% of all examinations were indicated to resolve questions arising from the chest radiogram, 10% to confirm or exclude pulmonary embolisms and 10% to confirm or exclude aortic dissection. In 10% a focus of infection was sought. 57% of all CT examinations had an impact on therapy, in 7% further diagnostic tests were prompted. Among a total of 588 clinical decisions based upon chest CT, the most frequent therapeutic conclusions consisted in: minimally invasive CT guided interventions in 17%. A new drug was administered in 13%, surgical intervention was performed in 13%, bed-side interventions such as insertion of a drainage tube in 13%, and a given pharmacological therapy was continued in 11%. CONCLUSION: Chest CT has a strong impact on patient management in emergency and critical-care medicine. CT guided interventions are frequently used in critically-ill patients. The introduction of the spiral technique has led to important new CT indications in the field of non-invasive vascular diagnosis, namely the assessment of pulmonary embolism and aortic dissection.
PURPOSE: Evaluation of the impact, indications, and therapeutic efficiency of chest CT in intensive-care and emergency patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective assessment of 741 consecutive chest CT, or which 74% were acquired in the spiral technique, in intensive-care and emergency patients. Chest CT scans and respective clinical data were compared. RESULTS: 16% of all examinations were indicated to resolve questions arising from the chest radiogram, 10% to confirm or exclude pulmonary embolisms and 10% to confirm or exclude aortic dissection. In 10% a focus of infection was sought. 57% of all CT examinations had an impact on therapy, in 7% further diagnostic tests were prompted. Among a total of 588 clinical decisions based upon chest CT, the most frequent therapeutic conclusions consisted in: minimally invasive CT guided interventions in 17%. A new drug was administered in 13%, surgical intervention was performed in 13%, bed-side interventions such as insertion of a drainage tube in 13%, and a given pharmacological therapy was continued in 11%. CONCLUSION: Chest CT has a strong impact on patient management in emergency and critical-care medicine. CT guided interventions are frequently used in critically-ill patients. The introduction of the spiral technique has led to important new CT indications in the field of non-invasive vascular diagnosis, namely the assessment of pulmonary embolism and aortic dissection.