Literature DB >> 9893991

Kinetic mechanism of damage site recognition and uracil flipping by Escherichia coli uracil DNA glycosylase.

J T Stivers1, K W Pankiewicz, K A Watanabe.   

Abstract

The DNA repair enzyme uracil DNA glycosylase (UDG) catalyzes hydrolytic cleavage of the N-glycosidic bond of premutagenic uracil residues in DNA by flipping the uracil base from the DNA helix. The mechanism of base flipping and the role this step plays in site-specific DNA binding and catalysis by enzymes are largely unknown. The thermodynamics and kinetics of DNA binding and uracil flipping by UDG have been studied in the absence of glycosidic bond cleavage using substrate analogues containing the 2'-alpha and 2'-beta fluorine isomers of 2'-fluoro-2'-deoxyuridine (Ubeta, Ualpha) positioned adjacent to a fluorescent nucleotide reporter group 2-aminopurine (2-AP). Activity measurements show that DNA containing a Ubeta or Ualpha nucleotide is a 10(7)-fold slower substrate for UDG (t1/2 approximately 20 h), which allows measurements of DNA binding and base flipping in the absence of glycosidic bond cleavage. When UDG binds these analogues, but not other DNA molecules, a 4-8-fold 2-AP fluorescence enhancement is observed, as expected for a decrease in 2-AP base stacking resulting from enzymatic flipping of the adjacent uracil. Thermodynamic measurements show that UDG forms weak nonspecific complexes with dsDNA (KDns = 1.5 microM) and binds approximately 25-fold more tightly to Ubeta containing dsDNA (KDapp approximately 50 nM). Thus, base flipping contributes less than approximately 2 kcal/mol to the free energy of binding and is not a major component of the >10(6)-fold catalytic specificity of UDG. Kinetic studies at 25 degrees C show that site-specific binding occurs by a two-step mechanism. The first step (E + S left and right arrow ES) involves the diffusion-controlled binding of UDG to form a weak nonspecific complex with the DNA (KD approximately 1.5-3 microM). The second step (ES left and right arrow E'F) involves a rapid step leading to reversible uracil flipping (kmax approximately 1200 s-1). This step is followed closely by a conformational change in UDG that was monitored by the quenching of tryptophan fluorescence. The results provide evidence for an enzyme-assisted mechanism for uracil flipping and exclude a passive mechanism in which the enzyme traps a transient extrahelical base in the free substrate. The data suggest that the duplex structure of the DNA is locally destabilized before the base-flipping step, thereby facilitating extrusion of the uracil. Thus, base flipping contributes little to the free energy of DNA binding but contributes greatly to specificity through an induced-fit mechanism.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 9893991     DOI: 10.1021/bi9818669

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochemistry        ISSN: 0006-2960            Impact factor:   3.162


  74 in total

1.  Efficient recognition of substrates and substrate analogs by the adenine glycosylase MutY requires the C-terminal domain.

Authors:  N H Chmiel; M P Golinelli; A W Francis; S S David
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2001-01-15       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 2.  AdoMet-dependent methylation, DNA methyltransferases and base flipping.

Authors:  X Cheng; R J Roberts
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2001-09-15       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  Association of an RNA kissing complex analyzed using 2-aminopurine fluorescence.

Authors:  M Rist; J Marino
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2001-06-01       Impact factor: 16.971

4.  Substitutions at tyrosine 66 of Escherichia coli uracil DNA glycosylase lead to characterization of an efficient enzyme that is recalcitrant to product inhibition.

Authors:  Narottam Acharya; Ramappa K Talawar; K Saikrishnan; M Vijayan; Umesh Varshney
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-12-15       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  Protein-facilitated base flipping in DNA by cytosine-5-methyltransferase.

Authors:  Niu Huang; Nilesh K Banavali; Alexander D MacKerell
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-12-27       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Unusual 2-aminopurine fluorescence from a complex of DNA and the EcoKI methyltransferase.

Authors:  T-J Su; B A Connolly; C Darlington; R Mallin; D T F Dryden
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-04-23       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  An iron-sulfur cluster loop motif in the Archaeoglobus fulgidus uracil-DNA glycosylase mediates efficient uracil recognition and removal.

Authors:  Lisa M Engstrom; Olga A Partington; Sheila S David
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2012-06-12       Impact factor: 3.162

8.  2'-Fluorinated Hydantoins as Chemical Biology Tools for Base Excision Repair Glycosylases.

Authors:  Sheng Cao; JohnPatrick Rogers; Jongchan Yeo; Brittany Anderson-Steele; Jonathan Ashby; Sheila S David
Journal:  ACS Chem Biol       Date:  2020-03-13       Impact factor: 5.100

9.  Comparative Effects of Ions, Molecular Crowding, and Bulk DNA on the Damage Search Mechanisms of hOGG1 and hUNG.

Authors:  Shannen L Cravens; James T Stivers
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2016-09-07       Impact factor: 3.162

10.  Mutational analysis of arginine 276 in the leucine-loop of human uracil-DNA glycosylase.

Authors:  Cheng-Yao Chen; Dale W Mosbaugh; Samuel E Bennett
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2004-08-31       Impact factor: 5.157

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.