OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to evaluate the quality of laser ablation in comparison with the classical drilling preparation. METHODS: For the experiment, the Er:YAG laser drilling machine was used. The system had a laser head, water cooler, and power supply with automatic control. Spot size of 300-350 microns was used for the preparation. Repetition rate of 1-4 Hz, and pulse energies of 100-400 mJ with water spray were chosen. Cavity shape in comparison with classical drill, time of preparation, and influence of cavity shape on filling materials retention in accordance with the U.S. Public Health Service System were used. The evaluation criteria for noncontact Er:YAG ablation were done. RESULTS: The cavity shape is irregular, but spot surface has larger area and microretentive appearance. Caries of enamel and dentin were treated with a noncontact preparation. It was possible to remove the old insufficient fillings, except for amalgam or metal alloys. The average number of pulses was 111.22 (SE 67.57). Vibrations of microexplosions during preparation were felt by patients on 14 cavities; however, nobody felt unpleasant pain. The qualities of filling materials in laser cavities were very stable; however, cavo surface margin discoloration of 82-86% of Alfa rating could be a problem. Changes of the color and anatomic form of the tooth were observed in 4-8%. CONCLUSIONS: In comparison with the classical treatment, it could be said that the retention and quality of filling materials is the same or very similar.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to evaluate the quality of laser ablation in comparison with the classical drilling preparation. METHODS: For the experiment, the Er:YAG laser drilling machine was used. The system had a laser head, water cooler, and power supply with automatic control. Spot size of 300-350 microns was used for the preparation. Repetition rate of 1-4 Hz, and pulse energies of 100-400 mJ with water spray were chosen. Cavity shape in comparison with classical drill, time of preparation, and influence of cavity shape on filling materials retention in accordance with the U.S. Public Health Service System were used. The evaluation criteria for noncontact Er:YAG ablation were done. RESULTS: The cavity shape is irregular, but spot surface has larger area and microretentive appearance. Caries of enamel and dentin were treated with a noncontact preparation. It was possible to remove the old insufficient fillings, except for amalgam or metal alloys. The average number of pulses was 111.22 (SE 67.57). Vibrations of microexplosions during preparation were felt by patients on 14 cavities; however, nobody felt unpleasant pain. The qualities of filling materials in laser cavities were very stable; however, cavo surface margin discoloration of 82-86% of Alfa rating could be a problem. Changes of the color and anatomic form of the tooth were observed in 4-8%. CONCLUSIONS: In comparison with the classical treatment, it could be said that the retention and quality of filling materials is the same or very similar.
Authors: B Bahrami; N Askari; M Tielemans; D Heysselaer; L Lamard; A Peremans; C Nyssen-Behets; S Nammour Journal: Lasers Med Sci Date: 2010-03-23 Impact factor: 3.161
Authors: Teresa C D Carrieri; Patricia M de Freitas; Ricardo S Navarro; Carlos de P Eduardo; Matsuyoshi Mori Journal: Lasers Med Sci Date: 2007-01-18 Impact factor: 3.161
Authors: Walter Raucci-Neto; Carla Raquel Dos Santos; Fabrício Augusto de Lima; Jesus Djalma Pécora; Luciano Bachmann; Regina Guenka Palma-Dibb Journal: Lasers Med Sci Date: 2014-04-23 Impact factor: 3.161