Literature DB >> 9888769

The value of internal carotid systolic velocity ratio for assessing carotid artery stenosis with Doppler sonography.

G Soulez1, E Therasse, P Robillard, A Fontaine, N Denbow, P Bourgouin, V L Oliva.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the value of the ratio between the internal carotid systolic velocity (ICSV) at the carotid bulb and the distal internal carotid systolic velocity (DICSV) for the detection of carotid artery stenosis. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Two hundred eleven patients were enrolled in a prospective study comparing several Doppler measurements with carotid angiography. The following spectral measurements were obtained with Doppler sonography: ICSV/DICSV ratio, ICSV, ICSV/common carotid systolic velocity (CCSV) ratio, and internal carotid (end) diastolic velocity (ICDV). Receiver operating characteristic curves were generated for two groups: the first group being 365 carotid arteries for which all Doppler measurements were successfully obtained and the second being a subgroup of 258 carotid arteries for which an ICSV of 100 cm/sec or greater was present.
RESULTS: In the group of 365 carotid arteries, the ICSV/DICSV ratio improved the detection of stenosis of 60% or greater as compared with the ICDV (p = .03). In 258 carotid arteries with an ICSV of 100 cm/sec or greater, the ICSV/DICSV ratio allowed for a better angiographic correlation for identifying stenoses of 60% or greater and 70% or greater as compared with ICSV (p = .006 and .023, respectively), ICSV/CCSV (p = .0013 and .003, respectively), and ICDV (p = .0015 and .020, respectively).
CONCLUSION: Using the ICSV/DICSV ratio for the Doppler detection of carotid artery stenosis is advantageous when the ICSV is 100 cm/sec or greater.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 9888769     DOI: 10.2214/ajr.172.1.9888769

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  4 in total

1.  Sonographic NASCET index: a new doppler parameter for assessment of internal carotid artery stenosis.

Authors:  Gasser M Hathout; James R Fink; Suzie M El-Saden; Edward G Grant
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Computer vision approach for ultrasound Doppler angle estimation.

Authors:  Ashraf A Saad; Thanasis Loupas; Linda G Shapiro
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2008-05-17       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 3.  Duplex ultrasound for diagnosing symptomatic carotid stenosis in the extracranial segments.

Authors:  Nicolle Cassola; Jose Cc Baptista-Silva; Luis Cu Nakano; Carolina Dq Flumignan; Ricardo Sesso; Vladimir Vasconcelos; Nelson Carvas Junior; Ronald Lg Flumignan
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-07-11

Review 4.  Indications for carotid artery surgery and stent: the role of carotid ultrasound.

Authors:  Yong Jae Kim; Charles H Tegeler
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 2.931

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.