Literature DB >> 9888755

Three-dimensional MR coronary angiography using the navigator technique compared with conventional coronary angiography.

J J Sandstede1, T Pabst, M Beer, N Geis, W Kenn, S Neubauer, D Hahn.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of three-dimensional (3D) MR coronary angiography with the navigator technique for the detection of coronary artery stenoses in comparison with that of conventional radiographic angiography. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Thirty patients with coronary artery disease were examined with an ECG-triggered 3D fast low-angle shot sequence using retrospective respiratory gating and the navigator technique on a 1.5-T MR scanner. The data set was evaluated as a 3D view with a surface rendering technique.
RESULTS: Imaging of the proximal coronary arteries was possible in all patients. The average visualized lengths of the left main, left anterior descending, left circumflex, and right coronary arteries were 1.9+/-0.5 cm (mean +/- SD), 5.2+/-2.3 cm, 4.2+/-1.9 cm, and 5.2+/-2.5 cm, respectively. Irregular breathing reduced image quality in seven of the 30 patients, making diagnosis of stenoses impossible. In the 77% of patients whose examinations resulted in high-quality images, the sensitivity and specificity for detection of significant stenoses and occlusions in all four main coronary arteries were 81% and 89%, respectively.
CONCLUSION: The navigator technique allows reproducible imaging of the proximal course of coronary arteries. This technique obviates breath-hold studies, thus allowing more patients to be examined. In patients whose examinations resulted in high-quality images, significant coronary artery lesions could be seen. However, for widespread clinical use, further technical improvement is necessary to increase sensitivity and specificity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 9888755     DOI: 10.2214/ajr.172.1.9888755

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  8 in total

1.  Non-invasive coronary imaging: computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging?

Authors:  C R Peebles
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 5.994

2.  Toward comparability of coronary magnetic resonance angiography: proposal for a standardized quantitative assessment.

Authors:  Martijn S Dirksen; Hildo J Lamb; Rob van der Geest; Albert de Roos
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-08-02       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  3D motion adapted gating (3D MAG): a new navigator technique for accelerated acquisition of free breathing navigator gated 3D coronary MR-angiography.

Authors:  M Hackenbroch; K Nehrke; J Gieseke; C Meyer; K Tiemann; H Litt; O Dewald; C P Naehle; H Schild; T Sommer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-04-07       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 4.  Role of magnetic resonance imaging in visualizing coronary arteries.

Authors:  Sumeesh Dhawan; Kodlipet C Dharmashankar; Tahir Tak
Journal:  Clin Med Res       Date:  2004-08

Review 5.  The promise of whole-heart coronary MRI.

Authors:  Thomas H Hauser; Warren J Manning
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 6.  MR coronary angiography--basic methodology and current status.

Authors:  J Sandstede
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 2.310

7.  Contrast enhanced electron beam computed tomography to analyse the coronary arteries in patients after acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  S Achenbach; D Ropers; M Regenfus; G Muschiol; W G Daniel; W Moshage
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 5.994

8.  Non-invasive intravenous coronary angiography using electron beam tomography and multislice computed tomography.

Authors:  A W Leber; A Knez; C Becker; A Becker; C White; C Thilo; M Reiser; R Haberl; G Steinbeck
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 5.994

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.