| Literature DB >> 9888106 |
C Milbrath1, M Bond, S Cooper, H J Znoj, M J Horowitz, J C Perry.
Abstract
Using sequential analysis, the authors examined how therapists' actions related to the verbal disclosure and defensive patterns that followed therapists' interventions within a single therapy hour for 20 patients. At the same time, a new measure, the Psychodynamic Intervention Rating Scale (PIRS), was tested for reliability and construct validity. Results indicated that therapists fit their styles of intervention to patients' levels of distress and functioning. Within the session, patient's emotional elaboration was followed by therapist's defense interpretation, followed by more patient emotional elaboration. Patient elaboration of significance was followed by more transference interpretation, followed by more patient elaboration of significance. Noninterpretive interventions were followed by patient's disclosure of facts, not emotion. Both interpretive intervention process sequences and therapist's use of support predicted posttreatment symptom reduction. The PIRS was shown to have satisfactory reliability and construct validity.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 1999 PMID: 9888106 PMCID: PMC3330527
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Psychother Pract Res ISSN: 1055-050X