Literature DB >> 9888018

Models for early chemoprevention trials in breast cancer.

C J Fabian1, B F Kimler, R M Elledge, W E Grizzle, S W Beenken, J H Ward.   

Abstract

Several models are being explored for use in the phase I and phase II evaluation of breast cancer chemoprevention agents. The short-term DCIS/small invasive cancer model is probably best used in late phase I trials in conjunction with agents likely to have activity in the progression phase of neoplastic development in addition to activity in earlier phases. The core biopsy or FNA hyperplasia models may be best used with drugs that are likely to have activity primarily in the promotion phase of neoplastic development and that are suitable for longer duration trials lasting several months to years. Morphology currently is the key surrogate endpoint biomarker for assessing efficacy in phase II trials. Other biomarkers that may undergo modulation will have to be validated, in that modulation will have to be shown to be directly related to decreased cancer risk in subsequent phase III trials. Only then can they be considered as validated surrogate endpoint biomarkers and used as stand-alone efficacy markers in phase II trials. Despite accrual challenges and technologic hurdles, interest in phase I and phase II chemoprevention trials is high.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9888018     DOI: 10.1016/s0889-8588(05)70038-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hematol Oncol Clin North Am        ISSN: 0889-8588            Impact factor:   3.722


  7 in total

Review 1.  Chemoprevention for pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Robert A Wolff
Journal:  Int J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2003

2.  Molecular biomarkers for breast cancer prognosis: coexpression of c-erbB-2 and p53.

Authors:  S W Beenken; W E Grizzle; D R Crowe; M G Conner; H L Weiss; M T Sellers; H Krontiras; M M Urist; K I Bland
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Use of Biomarker Modulation in Normal Mammary Epithelium as a Correlate for Efficacy of Chemopreventive Agents Against Chemically Induced Cancers.

Authors:  Ronald A Lubet; Brandy M Heckman-Stoddard; Jennifer T Fox; Fariba Moeinpour; M Margaret Juliana; Robert H Shoemaker; Clinton J Grubbs
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2019-12-23

4.  Translational pathology of neoplasia.

Authors:  William E Grizzle; Sudhir Srivastava; Upender Manne
Journal:  Cancer Biomark       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 4.388

Review 5.  Chemoprevention of breast cancer: implications for postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Carol J Fabian; Bruce F Kimler
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 6.  Breast cancer chemoprevention: beyond tamoxifen.

Authors:  C J Fabian
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2001-01-17       Impact factor: 6.466

7.  The expression of prostate-specific antigen in invasive breast carcinoma and its relationship with routine clinicopathologic parameters.

Authors:  Fereshteh Mohammadizadeh; Mohammad Ranaee; Mohsen Hani Tabaei Zavareh; Mehri Faghihi; Mahdieh Saremi; Mehdi Eftekhari
Journal:  Adv Biomed Res       Date:  2012-08-28
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.