Literature DB >> 9887912

Is there gender bias in research fellowships awarded by the NHMRC?

J E Ward1, N Donnelly.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether there is gender bias in the allocation of research fellowships granted by the Research Fellowships Committee of the National Health and Medical Research Council. DATA SOURCES: Anonymous data from applications for a research fellowship from 1994 to 1997.
RESULTS: More men than women apply for research fellowships (sex ratio, 2.5:1), but there is no difference in the proportion of male or female applicants who succeed in their application. Among new applicants, men tend to apply for a higher level of fellowship than women.
CONCLUSIONS: Lack of data about the numbers of eligible men and women means that we cannot draw conclusions about self-selection biases among potential applicants. However, the selection procedures of the Committee appear to be unbiased. The gender of applicants does not influence the outcome of their application.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9887912     DOI: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1998.tb123438.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med J Aust        ISSN: 0025-729X            Impact factor:   7.738


  4 in total

1.  Assessment of potential bias in research grant peer review in Canada.

Authors:  Robyn Tamblyn; Nadyne Girard; Christina J Qian; James Hanley
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2018-04-23       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 2.  The leaky pipeline in research grant peer review and funding decisions: challenges and future directions.

Authors:  Sayaka Sato; Pascal Mark Gygax; Julian Randall; Marianne Schmid Mast
Journal:  High Educ (Dordr)       Date:  2020-10-03

3.  Gender differences in publication output: towards an unbiased metric of research performance.

Authors:  Matthew R E Symonds; Neil J Gemmell; Tamsin L Braisher; Kylie L Gorringe; Mark A Elgar
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2006-12-27       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Does Gender Matter in Grant Peer Review?: An Empirical Investigation Using the Example of the Austrian Science Fund.

Authors:  Rüdiger Mutz; Lutz Bornmann; Hans-Dieter Daniel
Journal:  Z Psychol       Date:  2012
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.