Literature DB >> 9887849

Patient-physician communication assessment instruments: 1986 to 1996 in review.

H Boon1, M Stewart.   

Abstract

This paper provides a comprehensive review and comparison of instruments used to assess patient-doctor interaction over the past decade. Instruments were identified from papers indexed by MEDLINE from 1986 to 1996 using the medical subject headings 'physician-patient relations', 'physician-patient communication', and 'education, medical', as well as requests for instruments currently in use by colleagues. Each instrument was reviewed under the following categories: name of the instrument; description; number of items; reliability; validity; current use and special notes. Overall, 44 instruments were obtained and reviewed. Of these, 21 were used in only one published study each in the last decade and 15 have never been validated. While most instruments have been shown to be reliable (usually inter-rater reliability), very few instruments have been directly compared with another instrument designed to assess patient-doctor interactions. We suggest that further validation of existing instruments and incorporation of assessment of non-verbal communication between the patient and the doctor are needed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9887849     DOI: 10.1016/s0738-3991(98)00063-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Patient Educ Couns        ISSN: 0738-3991


  48 in total

1.  [The International Conference on Communication and Health of Barcelona 2000. One more step in the right direction].

Authors:  F Borrell i Carrió; R Epstein
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  2001-04-30       Impact factor: 1.137

2.  [The satisfaction adventures with the doctor-patient relationship in the land of questionnaires].

Authors:  José Luis Turabián; Benjamín Pérez Franco
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  2010-02-18       Impact factor: 1.137

3.  Interpersonal skill in medicine: the essential partner of verbal communication.

Authors:  Lawrence Dyche
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2007-04-17       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  The East Anglian specialist registrar assessment tool.

Authors:  Susan Robinson; Katharine Boursicot; Catherine Hayhurst
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.740

5.  Patients' perspectives on laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) aftercare attendance: qualitative assessment.

Authors:  Irina Moroshko; Leah Brennan; Narelle Warren; Wendy Brown; Paul O'Brien
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.129

6.  Relation of diabetic patients' health-related control appraisals and physician-patient interpersonal impacts to patients' metabolic control and satisfaction with treatment.

Authors:  Stephen M Auerbach; John N Clore; Donald J Kiesler; Tamara Orr; Phillip O Pegg; Ben G Quick; Christopher Wagner
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2002-02

Review 7.  Shared decision making: developing the OPTION scale for measuring patient involvement.

Authors:  G Elwyn; A Edwards; M Wensing; K Hood; C Atwell; R Grol
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2003-04

8.  Latent Semantic Analysis: A new measure of patient-physician communication.

Authors:  Scott R Vrana; Dylan T Vrana; Louis A Penner; Susan Eggly; Richard B Slatcher; Nao Hagiwara
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2017-12-18       Impact factor: 4.634

9.  [Evaluation of the patient centered clinical relationship: analysis of psychometric properties using the CICAA scale].

Authors:  Enrique Gavilán Moral; Roger Ruiz Moral; Luis Angel Perula de Torres; Juan Manuel Parras Rejano
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  2009-09-25       Impact factor: 1.137

10.  Frequency of GP communication addressing the patient's resources and coping strategies in medical interviews: a video-based observational study.

Authors:  Trond A Mjaaland; Arnstein Finset
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2009-07-01       Impact factor: 2.497

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.