Literature DB >> 9885945

CT number distribution and its association with local control and as a marker of lung tumor response to radiation.

R Mayer1, K Stanton, L Kleinberg, A Chakravarthy, E Fishman.   

Abstract

An early noninvasive indicator of tumor response to therapy and the ability to predict clinical outcome may potentially enhance disease management. Currently, however, tumor response to therapy is often delayed, potentially compromising disease management. We examined the computed tomography (CT) number or Hounsfield unit distribution to follow lung tumor response to radiation treatment. To help interpret the results, we examined whether the CT number distribution follows a simple two-component model. The CT number distribution was derived from a CT-simulator for 11 patients with lung cancer before and after the initial radiation treatment (1-1.5 months, average 3,407 cGy). Clinical outcomes were followed in 8 patients who received 5,580-6,660 cGy. All patients were scanned serially, using identical radiation imaging parameters (voltage, current, scan time, and slice thickness) in a CT-simulator. The lung tumors were digitally contoured, and software windows were applied to avoid inclusion of lung tissue in the analysis. Histograms and statistical analysis of the CT numbers for the tumor were generated. Radiation-induced CT number or Hounsfield unit (HU) shifts exceeding a threshold (13 HU) in lung tumors were associated with (P=0.04) local control (> or = 10 months). Initial lung tumor size (below 100 cm3) was less well-associated with local control (P=0.26). The change in standard deviation of the CT numbers (derived from the more careful contouring and using software windows) induced by radiation treatment correlated with the change in average CT number (R2=0.71). The change in standard deviation did not correlate with a change in tumor volume (R2=0.02). Radiation treatments reduced the average CT number (P < 0.001). In summary, radiation reduces the CT number and this reduction may be associated with local control at 10 months. A two-component model is consistent with lung tumor number distribution and its response to radiation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9885945     DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6823(1998)6:6<281::AID-ROI6>3.0.CO;2-H

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Oncol Investig        ISSN: 1065-7541


  5 in total

1.  Density overwrites of internal tumor volumes in intensity modulated proton therapy plans for mobile lung tumors.

Authors:  Pablo Botas; Clemens Grassberger; Gregory Sharp; Harald Paganetti
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-01-30       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Assessment of treatment response during chemoradiation therapy for pancreatic cancer based on quantitative radiomic analysis of daily CTs: An exploratory study.

Authors:  Xiaojian Chen; Kiyoko Oshima; Diane Schott; Hui Wu; William Hall; Yingqiu Song; Yalan Tao; Dingjie Li; Cheng Zheng; Paul Knechtges; Beth Erickson; X Allen Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-02       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  In-vivo Comparison of 18F-FLT uptake, CT Number, Tumor Volume in Evaluation of Repopulation during Radiotherapy for Lung cancer.

Authors:  Xiaoli Zhang; Jinming Yu; Chengming Li; Xindong Sun; Xue Meng
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-04-07       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Correlation of CT texture changes with treatment response during radiation therapy for esophageal cancer: An exploratory study.

Authors:  Zhumin Yan; Jingqiao Zhang; Hai Long; Xueming Sun; Dingjie Li; Tian Tang; X Allen Li; Wu Hui
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-09-26       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  The Value of CBCT-based Tumor Density and Volume Variations in Prediction of Early Response to Chemoradiation Therapy in Advanced NSCLC.

Authors:  Qiang Wen; Jian Zhu; Xue Meng; Changsheng Ma; Tong Bai; Xindong Sun; Jinming Yu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-11-07       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.