Literature DB >> 9885887

Pressure measurement evaluation and accuracy validation: the Gabarith test.

E Billiet1, F Colardyn.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The dynamic distortion introduced by manometric systems has been known for many years, with several methods developed to describe and quantify the degree of distortion. We developed the Gabarith as a technique to describe more accurately, and yet more simply, the dynamic accuracy of the chain of monitoring.
SETTING: A pressure monitoring system transforms some input signal, i.e. the actual pressure waveform present in the artery, into some other shape of waveform, i.e. the waveform displayed on the patient monitor. This transformation is characterized by the transfer function of the total system. A complete technique to define the transfer function is to measure the response directly at many different frequencies and combine them to produce the dynamic response plot.
METHOD: We described the dynamic response of a monitoring chain and we simplified the communication of this dynamic response to users by developing the Gabarith, as a tolerance envelope based on the frequency content of typical pressure waveforms. If a given monitoring chain's dynamic response (including a catheter, a pressure kit and a monitor) can be shown to fall within that tolerance envelope, the chain will provide adequate dynamic accuracy.
CONCLUSION: "Gabarith tested" means that a pressure kit, in combination with a catheter and a monitor, has had its frequency response function measured and that the function falls within a tolerance band for dynamic accuracy. Passing a Gabarith means that a given level of accuracy will be reached when using the sets which have passed the corresponding test.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9885887     DOI: 10.1007/s001340050769

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intensive Care Med        ISSN: 0342-4642            Impact factor:   17.440


  2 in total

1.  The assumed problem of air bubbles in the tubing during intra-abdominal pressure measurement.

Authors:  J J De Waele; E Billiet; E Hoste; F Colardyn
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2004-05-28       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Recommendation of a clinical impulse response analysis for catheter calibration-dumping coefficient and natural frequency are incomplete parameters for clinical evaluation.

Authors:  Hiroaki Watanabe; Shin-ichi Yagi; Akiyoshi Namiki
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2006-03-07       Impact factor: 2.502

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.