Literature DB >> 9885880

Airway occlusion pressure at 0.1 s (P0.1) after extubation: an early indicator of postextubation hypercapnic respiratory insufficiency.

G Hilbert1, D Gruson, L Portel, F Vargas, G Gbikpi-Benissan, J P Cardinaud.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine variables associated with postextubation respiratory distress in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients.
DESIGN: Prospective, clinical investigation.
SETTING: Intensive care unit of a university hospital. PATIENTS: Forty COPD patients, considered ready for extubation.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We recorded, from the digital display of a standard ventilator, breathing frequency (f), tidal volume (VT) and f/VT for the respiratory pattern, airway occlusion pressure at 0.1 s (P0.1) for the respiratory drive and measured blood gases: i) before extubation, following 30 min of a 6 cm H2O pressure support (PS) ventilation trial, ii) 1 h after extubation, at the 30th min of a face mask 4 cm H2O PS ventilation trial. According to the weaning outcome, the patients were divided into two groups: respiratory distress, and non-respiratory distress within 72 h of the discontinuation of mechanical ventilation. The respiratory distress was defined as the combination of f more than 25 breaths/min, an increase in PaCO2 of at least 20% compared with the value measured after extubation, and pH lower than 7.35. We determined whether those patients who developed respiratory distress after extubation differed from those who did not. Respiratory pattern data and arterial blood gases recorded, either before or after extubation, and P0.1 recorded before extubation, were inadequate to differentiate the two groups. Only P0.1 recorded 1 h after the discontinuation of mechanical ventilation differentiated the patients who developed respiratory distress from those who did not (4.2+/-0.9 vs 1.8+/-0.8, p < 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: P0.1 recorded after extubation may be a good indicator of postextubation respiratory distress. Measuring P0.1 and/or the analysis of the evolution of this parameter could facilitate decisions during the period following extubation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9885880     DOI: 10.1007/s001340050762

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intensive Care Med        ISSN: 0342-4642            Impact factor:   17.440


  6 in total

Review 1.  Prolonged Mechanical Ventilation: Outcomes and Management.

Authors:  Hung-Yu Huang; Chih-Yu Huang; Li-Fu Li
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-04-27       Impact factor: 4.964

2.  Response to hypercapnic challenge is associated with successful weaning from prolonged mechanical ventilation due to brain stem lesions.

Authors:  Yao-Kuang Wu; Chih-Hsin Lee; Ben-Chang Shia; Ying-Huang Tsai; Thomas C Y Tsao
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2008-07-10       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  Extubation failure: diagnostic value of occlusion pressure (P0.1) and P0.1-derived parameters.

Authors:  Rafael Fernandez; Juan Maria Raurich; Teresa Mut; Jesus Blanco; Antonio Santos; Ana Villagra
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2003-11-08       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 4.  Inactivity-induced respiratory plasticity: protecting the drive to breathe in disorders that reduce respiratory neural activity.

Authors:  K A Strey; N A Baertsch; T L Baker-Herman
Journal:  Respir Physiol Neurobiol       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 1.931

5.  Feasibility of non-invasive respiratory drive and breathing pattern evaluation using CPAP in COVID-19 patients.

Authors:  Auguste Dargent; Alexandra Hombreux; Hugo Roccia; Laurent Argaud; Martin Cour; Claude Guérin
Journal:  J Crit Care       Date:  2022-03-17       Impact factor: 4.298

6.  A Simple Weaning Model Based on Interpretable Machine Learning Algorithm for Patients With Sepsis: A Research of MIMIC-IV and eICU Databases.

Authors:  Wanjun Liu; Gan Tao; Yijun Zhang; Wenyan Xiao; Jin Zhang; Yu Liu; Zongqing Lu; Tianfeng Hua; Min Yang
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-01-18
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.