K M Chan1, S F Wong, T Yoong. 1. Department of Geriatric Medicine, Alexandra Hospital, Singapore.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: With a rapidly ageing population like Singapore, the need for nursing homes will increase. Admission to a nursing home may be for medical and/or social reasons. We carried out case studies with the Care Liaison Service (CLS) of the Ministry of Health to determine reasons why the elderly applied for nursing home admission, and whether it was possible to prevent an admission. PATIENTS: During the 6-month study period, 331 applications were received, of which 280 (84.6%) were > or = 60 years. There was an equal distribution of male (50.4%) and female (49.6%) applicants. Applicants were predominantly Chinese (86.0%), followed by Indians (8.0%), Malays and other races (3.0% each). Most of the applicants were semi-ambulant (50.0%), fully ambulant (31.4%) and non-ambulant (18.6%). The most common medical problems of the applicants were neurological (e.g. stroke, normal pressure hydrocephalus, epilepsy), heart diseases (e.g. hypertension, ischaemic heart disease, heart failure), orthopaedic conditions (e.g. osteoarthritis, fractures neck of femur and other fractures), and psychiatric problems (e.g. dementia, depression and history of schizophrenia/paranoid psychosis). METHOD: Fifty-seven applicants (20.4%) were selected for intervention. They were 'non-psychiatric' patients whose caregivers were willing but unable to look after them. About half (28, 49.1%) of these applicants required nursing home care. The remaining 29 patients (50.9%) had the potential of improving or able to remain at home with appropriate community services. These 29 patients were contacted by the CLS nurse and the following recommendations were made: 1) inpatient rehabilitation in a community hospital (7 patients); 2) rehabilitation and day care in a community-based day care centre (17 patients); 3) domiciliary medical care (4 patients), and 4) reassessment by psychiatrist to control psychotic symptoms (1 patient). Only 6 patients were willing to accept the new recommendations. This poor result may imply that attempts at intervention at this stage may be too late. CONCLUSION: We need to identify the group at risk for nursing home admissions early, take a proactive stance towards them, increase support to their caregivers to prevent burnt-out and continue to develop and publicize community-based services. More studies need to be done in this area.
BACKGROUND: With a rapidly ageing population like Singapore, the need for nursing homes will increase. Admission to a nursing home may be for medical and/or social reasons. We carried out case studies with the Care Liaison Service (CLS) of the Ministry of Health to determine reasons why the elderly applied for nursing home admission, and whether it was possible to prevent an admission. PATIENTS: During the 6-month study period, 331 applications were received, of which 280 (84.6%) were > or = 60 years. There was an equal distribution of male (50.4%) and female (49.6%) applicants. Applicants were predominantly Chinese (86.0%), followed by Indians (8.0%), Malays and other races (3.0% each). Most of the applicants were semi-ambulant (50.0%), fully ambulant (31.4%) and non-ambulant (18.6%). The most common medical problems of the applicants were neurological (e.g. stroke, normal pressure hydrocephalus, epilepsy), heart diseases (e.g. hypertension, ischaemic heart disease, heart failure), orthopaedic conditions (e.g. osteoarthritis, fractures neck of femur and other fractures), and psychiatric problems (e.g. dementia, depression and history of schizophrenia/paranoid psychosis). METHOD: Fifty-seven applicants (20.4%) were selected for intervention. They were 'non-psychiatric' patients whose caregivers were willing but unable to look after them. About half (28, 49.1%) of these applicants required nursing home care. The remaining 29 patients (50.9%) had the potential of improving or able to remain at home with appropriate community services. These 29 patients were contacted by the CLS nurse and the following recommendations were made: 1) inpatient rehabilitation in a community hospital (7 patients); 2) rehabilitation and day care in a community-based day care centre (17 patients); 3) domiciliary medical care (4 patients), and 4) reassessment by psychiatrist to control psychotic symptoms (1 patient). Only 6 patients were willing to accept the new recommendations. This poor result may imply that attempts at intervention at this stage may be too late. CONCLUSION: We need to identify the group at risk for nursing home admissions early, take a proactive stance towards them, increase support to their caregivers to prevent burnt-out and continue to develop and publicize community-based services. More studies need to be done in this area.