[Comparative study of artificial circulation for the liver after cardiogenic shock: pulsatile or nonpulsatile?].

Because of multiple organ failure (MOF), the survival rate of patients with mechanical circulatory support has not been satisfactory, The purpose of this study is to estimate the effects of pulsatile and nonpulsatile artificial circulation on hepatic microcirculation and function. Cardiogenic shock was induced experimentally by ligating of left anterior descending branch in pigs. For the right ventricular assist device, a nonpulsatile pump (Nikkiso HPM-15) was employed. The left ventricular function was supported by either a nonpulsatile pump (Nikkiso HPM-15: NP group) or a pulsatile pump (Zeon Medical: P group). NP group was further divided into 80% support (NP-1 group) and 100% support (NP-2 group) of the control cardiac output. All groups were maintained at an equivalent mean aortic pressure of 3 hours. We measured the hepatic artery blood flow, portal vein flow and hepatic regional blood flow. For the metabolic and hepatic oxygen metabolic data, GOT, GPT, arterial blood ketone body ratio (AKBR), lactate/pirubic acid (L/P), and hyaluronic acid were evaluated. The mean aortic pressure was higher in the NP-2 group than in the other groups. The hepatic arterial blood flow was significantly higher in the P group than in the others. The AKBR and hepatic oxygen metabolism showed significant improvement in the P group in comparison with others. The regional blood flow in the liver showed improvements in the P and NP-2 groups. These findings suggested that pulsatile circulation may be beneficial for microcirculation of the liver; and the augmented nonpulsatile flow had effects similar to those of pulsatile flow in hepatic circulation.