Literature DB >> 9884163

Comparison of alcohol-preferring and nonpreferring selectively bred rat lines. II. Operant self-administration in a continuous-access situation.

F J Files1, H H Samson, C E Denning, S Marvin.   

Abstract

Several rat lines have been developed using preference/nonpreference and daily ethanol intake in the homecage as criteria for selective breeding. Using these lines, behavioral and neural factors that may underlie the genetic basis for the control of ethanol consumption have been examined. In this paper, we report data from eight of these selected lines: the Alcohol-Preferring (P) and Alcohol-Nonpreferring (NP), the Alcohol-Accepting (AA) and Alcohol-Nonaccepting (ANA), and the High Alcohol Drinking (HAD1 and HAD2) and Low Alcohol Drinking (LAD1 and LAD2) rats. All lines were tested using operant procedures and the same protocols for both the ethanol self-administration initiation and measurement of continuous-access ethanol consumption. During continuous access, the animals were housed in operant chambers with access to 10% (v/v) ethanol after responses on one lever, food pellets (45 mg) after responses on a second lever, and water in a drinking tube that was connected to a drinkometer circuit. Under these procedures, both similarities and differences among the selected lines on continuous-access operant ethanol intake were observed. For example, overall total homecage ethanol drinking was similar for the AA and both HAD lines. When examined in the operant continuous-access situation, however, the AA rats displayed a different consumption pattem, compared with the HAD lines. Data suggest that the frequency of drinking bouts was a primary factor in the phenotypic homecage selection of the preferring lines that was revealed by the use of the continuous-access operant procedure. In general, data suggest that genes related to ethanol preference and intake in homecage continuous-access situations may not be identical to those related to ethanol's reinforcing function in operant continuous-access conditions. Because ethanol consumption appears to be controlled by different drinking patterns across lines, the selected lines provide for a variety of models to understand how varying genotypes can impact ethanol consumption.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9884163

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res        ISSN: 0145-6008            Impact factor:   3.455


  22 in total

1.  Increased consumption but not operant self-administration of ethanol in mice lacking the RIIbeta subunit of protein kinase A.

Authors:  Frank M Ferraro; Dennis R Sparta; Darin J Knapp; George R Breese; Todd E Thiele
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 3.455

Review 2.  Pharmacogenetic studies of alcohol self-administration and withdrawal.

Authors:  John C Crabbe; Tamara J Phillips
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2003-10-09       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  A genetic animal model of differential sensitivity to methamphetamine reinforcement.

Authors:  Shkelzen Shabani; Lauren K Dobbs; Matthew M Ford; Gregory P Mark; Deborah A Finn; Tamara J Phillips
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 5.250

Review 4.  Ethanol consumption: how should we measure it? Achieving consilience between human and animal phenotypes.

Authors:  Robert F Leeman; Markus Heilig; Christopher L Cunningham; David N Stephens; Theodora Duka; Stephanie S O'Malley
Journal:  Addict Biol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 4.280

Review 5.  Rodent models of genetic contributions to motivation to abuse alcohol.

Authors:  John C Crabbe
Journal:  Nebr Symp Motiv       Date:  2014

6.  Nicotinic receptor ligands reduce ethanol intake by high alcohol-drinking HAD-2 rats.

Authors:  Richard L Bell; Bill J A Eiler; Jason B Cook; Shafiqur Rahman
Journal:  Alcohol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.405

7.  Predicting extinction and reinstatement of alcohol and sucrose self-administration in outbred rats.

Authors:  Therese A Kosten; Richard A Meisch
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2013-02-18       Impact factor: 3.157

Review 8.  Animal models for medications development targeting alcohol abuse using selectively bred rat lines: neurobiological and pharmacological validity.

Authors:  Richard L Bell; Helen J K Sable; Giancarlo Colombo; Petri Hyytia; Zachary A Rodd; Lawrence Lumeng
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2012-07-25       Impact factor: 3.533

Review 9.  Scheduled access alcohol drinking by alcohol-preferring (P) and high-alcohol-drinking (HAD) rats: modeling adolescent and adult binge-like drinking.

Authors:  Richard L Bell; Zachary A Rodd; Eric A Engleman; Jamie E Toalston; William J McBride
Journal:  Alcohol       Date:  2013-10-31       Impact factor: 2.405

10.  Schedule-induced polydipsia in lines of rats selectively bred for high and low ethanol preference.

Authors:  N W Gilpin; N E Badia-Elder; R L Elder; R B Stewart
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2008-09-09       Impact factor: 2.805

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.