Literature DB >> 9884162

Comparison of alcohol-preferring and nonpreferring selectively bred rat lines. I. Ethanol initiation and limited access operant self-administration.

H H Samson1, F J Files, C Denning, S Marvin.   

Abstract

Several lines of alcohol-preferring and alcohol-nonpreferring rats have been developed using selective breeding based on 24-hr homecage ethanol consumption. However, it remains unclear if the selection based on two-bottle choice resulted in similar ethanol self-administration when measured using an operant procedure. In this paper, we compare our previous work using alcohol-accepting (AA) and alcohol-nonaccepting (ANA) rats with data obtained using the identical procedures in the (P) and (NP) rat lines, and both replicate lines of the high alcohol drinking (HAD1 and HAD2) and low alcohol drinking (LAD1 and LAD2) lines. All rats from each line were initiated to self-administer 10% ethanol using the sucrose fading procedure. After initiation, increasing concentrations of ethanol up to 30% ethanol were tested. The results indicated that only in the LAD1 and LAD2 lines was ethanol presentation not able to maintain lever pressing after initiation. Compared with the AA line, the P, HAD1, HAD2, and NP lines all self-administered more ethanol in the operant paradigm after initiation. The ANA line self-administered less ethanol than the AA line, but more than the LAD lines. Correlational analysis of homecage consumption with operant ethanol self-administration suggested that approximately 62% of the genetic variance in operant self-administration resulted from genes selected for the homecage drinking. At the same time, it was clear that there were genetic influences on operant self-administration that were not selected for by homecage ethanol drinking.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9884162

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res        ISSN: 0145-6008            Impact factor:   3.455


  28 in total

Review 1.  Pharmacogenetic studies of alcohol self-administration and withdrawal.

Authors:  John C Crabbe; Tamara J Phillips
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2003-10-09       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  Controlled and behaviorally relevant levels of oral ethanol intake in rhesus macaques using a flavorant-fade procedure.

Authors:  Simon N Katner; Claudia T Flynn; Stefani N Von Huben; Amber J Kirsten; Sophia A Davis; Christopher C Lay; Maury Cole; Amanda J Roberts; Howard S Fox; Michael A Taffe
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.455

Review 3.  Rodent models of genetic contributions to motivation to abuse alcohol.

Authors:  John C Crabbe
Journal:  Nebr Symp Motiv       Date:  2014

4.  Nicotinic receptor ligands reduce ethanol intake by high alcohol-drinking HAD-2 rats.

Authors:  Richard L Bell; Bill J A Eiler; Jason B Cook; Shafiqur Rahman
Journal:  Alcohol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.405

5.  Predicting extinction and reinstatement of alcohol and sucrose self-administration in outbred rats.

Authors:  Therese A Kosten; Richard A Meisch
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2013-02-18       Impact factor: 3.157

Review 6.  Animal models for medications development targeting alcohol abuse using selectively bred rat lines: neurobiological and pharmacological validity.

Authors:  Richard L Bell; Helen J K Sable; Giancarlo Colombo; Petri Hyytia; Zachary A Rodd; Lawrence Lumeng
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2012-07-25       Impact factor: 3.533

7.  Relationship between ethanol's acute locomotor effects and ethanol self-administration in male Long-Evans rats.

Authors:  Ann M Chappell; Jeff L Weiner
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2008-09-25       Impact factor: 3.455

Review 8.  Scheduled access alcohol drinking by alcohol-preferring (P) and high-alcohol-drinking (HAD) rats: modeling adolescent and adult binge-like drinking.

Authors:  Richard L Bell; Zachary A Rodd; Eric A Engleman; Jamie E Toalston; William J McBride
Journal:  Alcohol       Date:  2013-10-31       Impact factor: 2.405

9.  Schedule-induced polydipsia in lines of rats selectively bred for high and low ethanol preference.

Authors:  N W Gilpin; N E Badia-Elder; R L Elder; R B Stewart
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2008-09-09       Impact factor: 2.805

Review 10.  Ethanol drinking in rodents: is free-choice drinking related to the reinforcing effects of ethanol?

Authors:  Alexis S Green; Nicholas J Grahame
Journal:  Alcohol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 2.405

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.