Literature DB >> 9884063

Response of MG63 osteoblast-like cells to titanium and titanium alloy is dependent on surface roughness and composition.

J Lincks1, B D Boyan, C R Blanchard, C H Lohmann, Y Liu, D L Cochran, D D Dean, Z Schwartz.   

Abstract

The success of an implant is determined by its integration into the tissue surrounding the biomaterial. Surface roughness and composition are considered to influence the properties of adherent cells. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of chemical composition and surface roughness of commercially pure titanium (Ti) and Ti-6A1-4V alloy (Ti-A) on MG63 osteoblast-like cells. Unalloyed and alloyed Ti disks were machined and either fine-polished or wet-ground, resulting in smooth (S) and rough (R) finishes, respectively. Standard tissue culture plastic was used as a control. Surface topography and profile were evaluated by cold field emission scanning electron microscopy and profilometry, while chemical composition was determined using Auger electron spectroscopy and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. The effect on the cells was evaluated 24 h postconfluence by measuring cell number, [3H]-thymidine incorporation into DNA, cell and cell layer alkaline phosphatase specific activity (ALPase), osteocalcin and collagen production, [35S]-sulfate incorporation into proteoglycan, and prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) and transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta) production. When compared to plastic, the number of cells was reduced on the pure Ti surfaces, while it was equivalent on the Ti-A surfaces; [3H]-thymidine incorporation was reduced on all surfaces. The stimulatory effect of surface roughness on ALPase in isolated cells and the cell layer was more pronounced on the rougher surfaces, with enzyme activity on Ti-R being greater than on Ti-A-R. Osteocalcin production was increased only on the Ti-R surface. Collagen production was decreased on Ti surfaces except Ti-R; [35S]-sulfate incorporation was reduced on all surfaces. Surface roughness affected local factor production (TGF-beta, PGE2). The stimulatory effect of the rougher surfaces on PGE2 and TGF-beta was greater on Ti than Ti-A. In summary, cell proliferation, differentiation, protein synthesis and local factor production were affected by surface roughness and composition. Enhanced differentiation of cells grown on rough vs. smooth surfaces for both Ti and Ti-A surfaces was indicated by decreased proliferation and increased ALPase and osteocalcin production. Local factor production was also enhanced on rough surfaces, supporting the contention that these cells are more differentiated. Surface composition also played a role in cell differentiation, since cells cultured on Ti-R surfaces produced more ALPase than those cultured on Ti-A-R. While it is still unknown which material properties induce which cellular responses, this study suggests that surface roughness and composition may play a major role and that the best design for an orthopaedic implant is a pure titanium surface with a rough microtopography.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9884063     DOI: 10.1016/s0142-9612(98)00144-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomaterials        ISSN: 0142-9612            Impact factor:   12.479


  98 in total

1.  In vitro response of primary rat osteoblasts to titania/hydroxyapatite coatings compared with transformed human osteoblast-like cells.

Authors:  P A Ramires; F Cosentino; E Milella; P Torricelli; G Giavaresi; R Giardino
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  Human osteoblast adhesion on titanium alloy, stainless steel, glass and plastic substrates with same surface topography.

Authors:  K Anselme; B Noël; P Hardouin
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.896

3.  Biological behavior of sol-gel coated dental implants.

Authors:  P A Ramires; A Wennerberg; C B Johansson; F Cosentino; S Tundo; E Milella
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 4.  Surface treatments and roughness properties of Ti-based biomaterials.

Authors:  Andrea Bagno; Carlo Di Bello
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.896

5.  [Osteoblast reaction on SLA and microgrooved implant surfaces].

Authors:  T Fillies; H P Wiesmann; D Sommer; U Joos; U Meyer
Journal:  Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir       Date:  2005-01

6.  Physical and biological characterizations of a novel multiphase anodic spark deposition coating to enhance implant osseointegration.

Authors:  Carmen Giordano; Roberto Chiesa; Enrico Sandrini; Alberto Cigada; Gianluca Giavaresi; Milena Fini; Roberto Giardino
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.896

7.  Bone response to a titanium aluminium nitride coating on metallic implants.

Authors:  C O Freeman; I M Brook
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 3.896

8.  Formation of bone-like apatite layer on chitosan fiber mesh scaffolds by a biomimetic spraying process.

Authors:  K Tuzlakoglu; R L Reis
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2007-03-13       Impact factor: 3.896

9.  Evaluation of early stage human bone marrow stromal proliferation, cell migration and osteogenic differentiation on μ-MIM structured stainless steel surfaces.

Authors:  Malak Bitar; Fausta Benini; Claudia Brose; Vera Friederici; Philipp Imgrund; Arie Bruinink
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 3.896

10.  Effects of titanium surface anodization with CaP incorporation on human osteoblastic response.

Authors:  Natássia Cristina Martins Oliveira; Camilla Christian Gomes Moura; Darceny Zanetta-Barbosa; Daniela Baccelli Silveira Mendonça; Lyndon Cooper; Gustavo Mendonça; Paula Dechichi
Journal:  Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl       Date:  2013-01-11       Impact factor: 7.328

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.