Literature DB >> 9883306

Determinants of item nonresponse in a large national sex survey.

E Kupek1.   

Abstract

The study aim was to describe patterns of item nonresponse in a sex survey and identify factors associated with high nonresponse. A random sample of 4548 respondents to the National Survey of Sexual Attitudes and Lifestyles in Britain, 1990-1991 was assessed. Both respondent-wise and variable-wise patterns of incomplete response are described in terms of distinctive characteristics of nonrespondents and questions with a high nonresponse rate. Logistic regression was used to model the determinants of extreme nonresponse. For at least 90% of respondents, the item nonresponse was ignorable for most practical purposes and recall difficulties were indicated as its main cause, while the sensitivity of the questions had a large effect mainly among those in the top 5% of the overall nonresponse distribution. The latter were also distinguishable in terms of refusals to answer some face-to-face questions. Several overlapping indicators of poor educational and social background were associated with elevated overall nonresponse, particularly among the top 5% of the distribution. Thus recall accuracy rather than sensitivity of some sex survey questions was the key difficulty for a majority of the respondents whose overall nonresponse was satisfactorily low. The sensitivity of the topic had a large effect on item nonresponse only for a small group of participants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9883306     DOI: 10.1023/a:1018721100903

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Sex Behav        ISSN: 0004-0002


  2 in total

Review 1.  Are we missing the importance of missing values in HIV prevention randomized clinical trials? Review and recommendations.

Authors:  Ofer Harel; Jennifer Pellowski; Seth Kalichman
Journal:  AIDS Behav       Date:  2012-08

2.  Bias and heteroscedastic memory error in self-reported health behavior: an investigation using covariance structure analysis.

Authors:  Emil Kupek
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2002-11-18       Impact factor: 4.615

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.