T C Oskin1, K J Hansen, J S Deitch, T E Craven, R H Dean. 1. Departments of General Surgery and Public Health Sciences, Division of Surgical Sciences, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The surgical management of chronic atherosclerotic renal artery occlusion (RA-OCC) was studied. METHODS: From January 1987 through December 1996, 397 consecutive patients were treated for atherosclerotic renal artery disease. Ninety-five hypertensive patients (mean blood pressure, 204 +/- 31/106 +/- 20 mm Hg; mean medications, 3.0 +/- 1.1 drugs) were treated for 100 RA-OCCs. Eighty-four (88%) patients had renal dysfunction, defined by serum creatinine levels >/=1.3 mg/dL (mean serum creatinine level, 2.8 +/- 2.0 mg/dL). Demographic characteristics, operative morbidity and mortality, blood pressure/renal function response, and postoperative decline in renal function were examined and compared with that of 302 patients treated for renal artery stenosis (RAS). RESULTS: After operation, there were 5 perioperative deaths (5.2%), 2 (2.8%) after revascularization and 3 (12%) after nephrectomy (P =.11), compared with 12 (4.0%) perioperative deaths in the RAS group (P =.59). After controlling for important covariates, estimated survival and blood pressure benefits did not differ between RA-OCC patients treated by nephrectomy or revascularization (P =.13; 87% vs 92%, P =.54). Excretory renal function was considered improved in 49% of 79 RA-OCC patients with renal dysfunction, including 9 patients removed from dialysis-dependence. Among patients treated for unilateral disease, revascularization for RA-OCC was associated with significant improvement in renal function (P <.01); however, nephrectomy alone did not increase renal function significantly. Improved renal function after operation was associated with a significant and independent increase in survival (P <.01) and dialysis-free survival (P <.01) among patients treated for RA-OCC. In addition, blood pressure benefit, renal function response, and estimated survival did not differ significantly after reconstruction for RA-OCC or RAS. CONCLUSION: Among hypertensive patients treated for RA-OCC, equivalent beneficial blood pressure response was observed after both revascularization and nephrectomy. In patients who underwent bilateral renal artery revascularization, the change in excretory renal function attributable to repair of RA-OCC cannot be defined. In patients treated for unilateral disease, however, improvement in function was observed only after revascularization. Moreover, improved renal function demonstrated a significant and independent association with improved survival. This experience supports renal revascularization in preference to nephrectomy for RA-OCC in select hypertensive patients when a normal distal artery is demonstrated at operation.
PURPOSE: The surgical management of chronic atherosclerotic renal artery occlusion (RA-OCC) was studied. METHODS: From January 1987 through December 1996, 397 consecutive patients were treated for atherosclerotic renal artery disease. Ninety-five hypertensivepatients (mean blood pressure, 204 +/- 31/106 +/- 20 mm Hg; mean medications, 3.0 +/- 1.1 drugs) were treated for 100 RA-OCCs. Eighty-four (88%) patients had renal dysfunction, defined by serum creatinine levels >/=1.3 mg/dL (mean serum creatinine level, 2.8 +/- 2.0 mg/dL). Demographic characteristics, operative morbidity and mortality, blood pressure/renal function response, and postoperative decline in renal function were examined and compared with that of 302 patients treated for renal artery stenosis (RAS). RESULTS: After operation, there were 5 perioperative deaths (5.2%), 2 (2.8%) after revascularization and 3 (12%) after nephrectomy (P =.11), compared with 12 (4.0%) perioperative deaths in the RAS group (P =.59). After controlling for important covariates, estimated survival and blood pressure benefits did not differ between RA-OCC patients treated by nephrectomy or revascularization (P =.13; 87% vs 92%, P =.54). Excretory renal function was considered improved in 49% of 79 RA-OCC patients with renal dysfunction, including 9 patients removed from dialysis-dependence. Among patients treated for unilateral disease, revascularization for RA-OCC was associated with significant improvement in renal function (P <.01); however, nephrectomy alone did not increase renal function significantly. Improved renal function after operation was associated with a significant and independent increase in survival (P <.01) and dialysis-free survival (P <.01) among patients treated for RA-OCC. In addition, blood pressure benefit, renal function response, and estimated survival did not differ significantly after reconstruction for RA-OCC or RAS. CONCLUSION: Among hypertensivepatients treated for RA-OCC, equivalent beneficial blood pressure response was observed after both revascularization and nephrectomy. In patients who underwent bilateral renal artery revascularization, the change in excretory renal function attributable to repair of RA-OCC cannot be defined. In patients treated for unilateral disease, however, improvement in function was observed only after revascularization. Moreover, improved renal function demonstrated a significant and independent association with improved survival. This experience supports renal revascularization in preference to nephrectomy for RA-OCC in select hypertensivepatients when a normal distal artery is demonstrated at operation.
Authors: Andrea Schilcher; Hans Grüssing; Matthias Meissnitzer; Thomas Hölzenbein; Raimund Weitgasser Journal: Wien Klin Wochenschr Date: 2012-04-14 Impact factor: 1.704