Literature DB >> 9882033

Comparison of 24-h control of gastric acidity by three different dosages of pantoprazole in patients with duodenal ulcer.

V Savarino1, G S Mela, P Zentilin, G Bisso, M Pivari, S Vigneri, R Termini, S Fiorucci, P Usai, A Malesci, G Celle.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: It is now clear that the extent to which gastric acid secretion must be suppressed varies with the clinical condition being treated. AIM: To assess the 24-h control of gastric acidity and the individual response variability of three different doses of pantoprazole.
METHODS: Sixty-four duodenal ulcer patients were recruited for this prospective, randomized, multicentre, double-blind, parallel-group study. They were subdivided into three well-matched groups treated with 20 mg o.m., 40 mg o.m. and 40 mg b.d. of pantoprazole, respectively. Endoscopy and intragastric pH monitoring were performed in each patient before and after 14 days of treatment.
RESULTS: Fifty-five patients were eligible for final analysis (17 treated with 20 mg o.m., 18 with 40 mg o.m. and 20 with 40 mg b.d. pantoprazole). The ulcer crater healed in 94, 88 and 95% of cases, respectively. The three dosages of pantoprazole produced significant increases in gastric pH compared to basal levels (P < 0.0001). There was also a clear dose-dependent pharmacodynamic effect, which augmented on moving from the lowest dosage of 20 mg o.m. pantoprazole to the highest dosage of 40 mg b.d. (P < 0.01-0.001). The inter-individual response variability within the three treatment groups was more marked with the dose of 20 mg than with the two higher doses of pantoprazole.
CONCLUSIONS: All three doses of pantoprazole we tested are highly effective in decreasing gastric acidity and there is a clear dose-dependent pharmacodynamic effect on moving from the lowest to the highest dosage. The greatest inter individual variation in the degree of acid inhibition was seen with pantoprazole 20 mg o.m., while the majority of patients responded adequately to the two higher doses of the drug.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9882033     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2036.1998.00416.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther        ISSN: 0269-2813            Impact factor:   8.171


  5 in total

Review 1.  Clinical Implications of Emerging Data on the Safety of Proton Pump Inhibitors.

Authors:  Felice Schnoll-Sussman; Philip O Katz
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-03

2.  No relevant pharmacokinetic interaction between pantoprazole and mycophenolate in renal transplant patients: a randomized crossover study.

Authors:  Olesja Rissling; Petra Glander; Pia Hambach; Marco Mai; Susanne Brakemeier; Daniela Klonower; Fabian Halleck; Eugenia Singer; Eva-Vanessa Schrezenmeier; Michael Dürr; Hans-Hellmut Neumayer; Klemens Budde
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 4.335

3.  Prolonged Use of Proton Pump Inhibitors and Risk of Type 2 Diabetes: Results From a Large Population-Based Nested Case-Control Study.

Authors:  Stefano Ciardullo; Federico Rea; Laura Savaré; Gabriella Morabito; Gianluca Perseghin; Giovanni Corrao
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 6.134

Review 4.  The Safety of Appropriate Use of Over-the-Counter Proton Pump Inhibitors: An Evidence-Based Review and Delphi Consensus.

Authors:  David A Johnson; Philip O Katz; David Armstrong; Henry Cohen; Brendan C Delaney; Colin W Howden; Peter Katelaris; Radu I Tutuian; Donald O Castell
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 5.  Pharmacological Management of Gastro-Esophageal Reflux Disease: An Update of the State-of-the-Art.

Authors:  Vincenzo Savarino; Elisa Marabotto; Patrizia Zentilin; Maria Giulia Demarzo; Nicola de Bortoli; Edoardo Savarino
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2021-04-19       Impact factor: 4.162

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.