Literature DB >> 9881784

Inferior alveolar nerve function after sagittal split osteotomy of the mandible: correlation with degree of intraoperative nerve encounter and other variables in 496 operations.

A Westermark1, H Bystedt, L von Konow.   

Abstract

Dysfunction of the inferior alveolar nerve indicated by various degrees of numbness of the lower lip and chin is one of the few drawbacks of sagittal split osteotomy (SSO) of the mandible. Although it has been recorded throughout the history of this technique its true aetiology is poorly understood. In this study of 496 SSOs, we have evaluated possible correlations between neurosensory dysfunction and several variables that have been implicated, such as the age of the patient, mandibular movement, type of split technique and osteosynthesis, degree of intraoperative nerve encounter, and surgical skill. Nerve dysfunction developed after 200/496 SSOs (40%). The patient's age had a significant influence on the recovery of the neurosensory function. Intraoperative nerve encounter such as nerve manipulation correlated with dysfunction to a much lesser degree than expected. Surgical skill seemed to influence the recovery of neurosensory function after SSO, which is often referred to as a technique-sensitive procedure. We suggest that the dissection of the soft tissue on the medial aspect of the mandibular ramus might be partly responsible for nerve dysfunction of the lower lip and chin after SSO of the mandible.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9881784     DOI: 10.1016/s0266-4356(98)90458-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0266-4356            Impact factor:   1.651


  21 in total

1.  Skeletal Relapse After Mandibular Setback in Bi Max Surgery: Intraoral Vertical Ramus versus Bilateral Sagittal Split Osteotomies.

Authors:  Ra'ed M A Al-Delayme; Moutaz Al-Khen
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2013-08-06

2.  A morphometric analysis of the mandibular canal by cone beam computed tomography and its relevance to the sagittal split ramus osteotomy.

Authors:  Bruno Ramos Chrcanovic; Vinícius de Carvalho Machado; Björn Gjelvold
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2016-02-13

3.  Evaluation of neurosensory disturbance following orthognathic surgery: a prospective study.

Authors:  Saikrishna Degala; Sujeeth Kumar Shetty; M Bhanumathi
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2013-12-13

4.  Qualitative descriptors used by patients following orthognathic surgery to portray altered sensation.

Authors:  Ceib Phillips; Greg Essick; John Zuniga; Myron Tucker; George Blakey
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 1.895

5.  Sensory retraining after orthognathic surgery: effect on patients' perception of altered sensation.

Authors:  Ceib Phillips; Greg Essick; John S Preisser; Timothy A Turvey; Myron Tucker; Dongming Lin
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 1.895

6.  Neurosensory evaluation of inferior alveolar nerve after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy of mandible.

Authors:  P G Antony; Aneesh Sebastian; K George Varghese; C R Sobhana; S Mohan; C S Soumithran; Shiney Domnic; N Jayakumar
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2017-03-20

7.  Sensory retraining: burden in daily life related to altered sensation after orthognathic surgery, a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  C Phillips; S H Kim; M Tucker; T A Turvey
Journal:  Orthod Craniofac Res       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 1.826

8.  Hypoesthesia associated with mandibular movement after sagittal split ramus osteotomy.

Authors:  Toru Yamamoto; Keiko Fujii-Abe; Haruhisa Fukayama; Hiroshi Kawahara
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2017-06-05

9.  [Preoperative determination of the position of mandibular canal for planning sagittal ramus osteotomy of the mandible].

Authors:  E Pilling; M Schneider; R Mai; U Eckelt
Journal:  Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir       Date:  2003-12-16

10.  Effect of facial sensory re-training on sensory thresholds.

Authors:  G K Essick; C Phillips; J Zuniga
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 6.116

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.