Literature DB >> 9881467

Adaptive sex ratio variation in pre-industrial human (Homo sapiens) populations?

V Lummaa1, J Merilä, A Kause.   

Abstract

Sex allocation theory predicts that in a population with a biased operational sex ratio (OSR), parents will increase their fitness by adjusting the sex ratio of their progeny towards the rarer sex, until OSR has reached a level where the overproduction of either sex no longer increases a parent's probability of having grandchildren. Furthermore, in a monogamous mating system, a biased OSR is expected to lead to lowered mean fecundity among individuals of the more abundant sex. We studied the influence of OSR on the sex ratio of newborns and on the population birth rate using an extensive data set (n = 14,420 births) from pre-industrial (1775-1850) Finland. The overall effect of current OSR on sex ratio at birth was significant, and in the majority of the 21 parishes included in this study, more sons were produced when males were rarer than females. This suggests that humans adjusted the sex ratio of their offspring in response to the local OSR to maximize the reproductive success of their progeny. Birth rate and, presumably, also population growth rate increased when the sex ratio (males:females) among reproductive age classes approached equality. However, the strength of these patterns varied across the parishes, suggesting that factors other than OSR (e.g. socioeconomic or environmental factors may also have influenced the sex ratio at birth and the birth rate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9881467      PMCID: PMC1689011          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.1998.0331

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  16 in total

Review 1.  Haploidploidy and the evolution of the social insect.

Authors:  R L Trivers; H Hare
Journal:  Science       Date:  1976-01-23       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Sex ratio of white births in the United States during the Second World War.

Authors:  B MACMAHON; T F PUGH
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1954-06       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  Sexual selection and the potential reproductive rates of males and females.

Authors:  T H Clutton-Brock; A C Vincent
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1991-05-02       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 4.  The hypothesized hormonal control of human sex ratio at birth--an update.

Authors:  W H James
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1990-04-23       Impact factor: 2.691

Review 5.  Ecology, sexual selection, and the evolution of mating systems.

Authors:  S T Emlen; L W Oring
Journal:  Science       Date:  1977-07-15       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  A buffered interaction between sex ratio, age difference at marriage, and population growth in humans, and their significance for sex ratio evolution.

Authors:  A Beiles
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  1974-10       Impact factor: 3.821

Review 7.  Sex ratio variation in mammals.

Authors:  T H Clutton-Brock; G R Iason
Journal:  Q Rev Biol       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 4.875

8.  The question of adaptive sex ratio in outcrossed vertebrates.

Authors:  G C Williams
Journal:  Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1979-09-21

9.  Sons and daughters.

Authors:  T H Clutton-Brock
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1982-07-01       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Facultative sex ratios and population dynamics.

Authors:  J H Werren; E L Charnov
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1978-03-23       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  10 in total

1.  Reproducing lizards modify sex allocation in response to operational sex ratios.

Authors:  Daniel A Warner; Richard Shine
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2007-02-22       Impact factor: 3.703

2.  The global male-bias in sex ratio at birth is sustained by the sex ratio genotypes of replacement offspring.

Authors:  Corry Gellatly
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2019-08-07       Impact factor: 1.082

3.  Father absence and age at menarche : A test of four evolutionary models.

Authors:  Sabine Hoier
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2003-09

4.  Acute undernutrition is not associated with excess of females at birth in humans: the Dutch hunger winter.

Authors:  Aryeh D Stein; Patricia A Zybert; L H Lumey
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-05-07       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  The impact of sex ratio and economic status on local birth rates.

Authors:  A Chipman; E Morrison
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 3.703

6.  Market forces affect patterns of polygyny in Uganda.

Authors:  Thomas V Pollet; Daniel Nettle
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-01-21       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Driving a hard bargain: sex ratio and male marriage success in a historical US population.

Authors:  Thomas V Pollet; Daniel Nettle
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2008-02-23       Impact factor: 3.703

8.  Sex ratio effects on reproductive strategies in humans.

Authors:  Ryan Schacht; Monique Borgerhoff Mulder
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2015-01-14       Impact factor: 2.963

9.  A test of oscillation in the human secondary sex ratio.

Authors:  Ralph Catalano; Joan A Casey; Tim A Bruckner
Journal:  Evol Med Public Health       Date:  2020-04-21

10.  Does breeding population trajectory and age of nesting females influence disparate nestling sex ratios in two populations of Cooper's hawks?

Authors:  Robert N Rosenfield; William E Stout; Matthew D Giovanni; Noah H Levine; Jenna A Cava; Madeline G Hardin; Taylor G Haynes
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 2.912

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.