Literature DB >> 9880304

Any variability in outcome comparisons adjusted for case mix must be accounted for.

D F Signorini, N U Weir.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  1999        PMID： 9880304      PMCID： PMC1114593          DOI： 10.1136/bmj.318.7176.128a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN： 0959-8138


× No keyword cloud information.
  3 in total

1.  Confidence interval estimates of an index of quality performance based on logistic regression models.

Authors:  D W Hosmer; S Lemeshow
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1995-10-15       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  The CRIB (clinical risk index for babies) score: a tool for assessing initial neonatal risk and comparing performance of neonatal intensive care units. The International Neonatal Network.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1993-07-24       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Annual league tables of mortality in neonatal intensive care units: longitudinal study. International Neonatal Network and the Scottish Neonatal Consultants and Nurses Collaborative Study Group.

Authors:  G J Parry; C R Gould; C J McCabe; W O Tarnow-Mordi
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-06-27
  3 in total
  3 in total

Review 1.  Neonatal disease severity scoring systems.

Authors:  J S Dorling; D J Field; B Manktelow
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 5.747

Review 2.  International comparison of variation in performance between hospitals for THA and TKA: Is it even possible? A systematic review including 33 studies and 8 arthroplasty register reports.

Authors:  Peter van Schie; Shaho Hasan; Leti van Bodegom-Vos; Jan W Schoones; Rob G H H Nelissen; Perla J Marang-van de Mheen
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2022-04-21

3.  Quantifying the potential bias when directly comparing standardised mortality ratios for in-unit neonatal mortality.

Authors:  T Alun Evans; Sarah E Seaton; Bradley N Manktelow
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-05       Impact factor: 3.240
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.