R W Peters1, S R Shorofsky, M Pelini, M Olsovsky, M R Gold. 1. Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, the University of Maryland, and the Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Baltimore 21201, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Previous studies have reported varying success rates in overdrive pace termination of atrial flutter. We hypothesized that these discrepancies might be caused by differences in study populations. Accordingly, we prospectively compared the success rate of pacing in patients with atrial flutter that occurred after heart surgery with that of patients with atrial flutter from other causes. METHODS AND RESULTS: The study population consisted of 65 consecutive patients referred for pace termination of typical (type I) atrial flutter. Pacing was performed in 30-second bursts, starting at the flutter cycle length, and repeated in 5-ms decrements until normal sinus rhythm or atrial fibrillation occurred. Normal sinus rhythm was restored in 38 (65%) patients. Of 20 patients whose flutter was precipitated by heart surgery, 19 (95%) were successfully pace terminated. In contrast, pace termination was successful in only 47% of the remainder of the population (P <.001). No other clinical parameters were predictive of outcome. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that overdrive pacing is an effective means of terminating atrial flutter that has occurred after heart surgery. Alternative methods should be considered as the initial therapeutic approach in patients with atrial flutter from other causes.
BACKGROUND: Previous studies have reported varying success rates in overdrive pace termination of atrial flutter. We hypothesized that these discrepancies might be caused by differences in study populations. Accordingly, we prospectively compared the success rate of pacing in patients with atrial flutter that occurred after heart surgery with that of patients with atrial flutter from other causes. METHODS AND RESULTS: The study population consisted of 65 consecutive patients referred for pace termination of typical (type I) atrial flutter. Pacing was performed in 30-second bursts, starting at the flutter cycle length, and repeated in 5-ms decrements until normal sinus rhythm or atrial fibrillation occurred. Normal sinus rhythm was restored in 38 (65%) patients. Of 20 patients whose flutter was precipitated by heart surgery, 19 (95%) were successfully pace terminated. In contrast, pace termination was successful in only 47% of the remainder of the population (P <.001). No other clinical parameters were predictive of outcome. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that overdrive pacing is an effective means of terminating atrial flutter that has occurred after heart surgery. Alternative methods should be considered as the initial therapeutic approach in patients with atrial flutter from other causes.
Authors: Paolo Terranova; Barbara Severgnini; Paolo Valli; Simonetta Dell'Orto; Enrico Maria Greco Journal: Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J Date: 2006-07-01