Literature DB >> 9878512

The Impact of Positive and Negative Affect and Issue Framing on Issue Interpretation and Risk Taking.

.   

Abstract

Two studies examined the influence of transient affective states and issue framing on issue interpretation and risk taking within the context of strategic decision making. In Study 1, participants in whom transient positive or negative affective states were induced by reading a short story showed systematic differences in issue interpretation and risk taking in a strategic decision making context. Compared to negative mood participants, those in a positive mood were more likely to interpret the strategic issue as an opportunity and displayed lower levels of risk taking. Study 2 replicated and extended these results by crossing affective states with threat and opportunity frames. Results showed that framing an issue (as a threat or an opportunity) had a stronger impact on issue interpretation among negative affect participants than among positive affect participants. Affective states also moderated the impact of issue framing on risk taking: the effect of framing on risk-taking was stronger under negative rather than positive affect. These results are interpreted via information-processing and motivational effects of affect on a decision maker. Copyright 1998 Academic Press.

Entities:  

Year:  1998        PMID: 9878512     DOI: 10.1006/obhd.1998.2808

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Organ Behav Hum Decis Process        ISSN: 0749-5978


  13 in total

1.  Rationality versus reality: the challenges of evidence-based decision making for health policy makers.

Authors:  Deirdre McCaughey; Nealia S Bruning
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 7.327

2.  Neural basis of emotional decision making in trait anxiety.

Authors:  Pengfei Xu; Ruolei Gu; Lucas S Broster; Runguo Wu; Nicholas T Van Dam; Yang Jiang; Jin Fan; Yue-jia Luo
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Barriers to Household Risk Management: Evidence from India.

Authors:  Shawn Cole; Xavier Giné; Jeremy Tobacman; Robert Townsend; Petia Topalova; James Vickery
Journal:  Am Econ J Appl Econ       Date:  2013-01-01

4.  Changes in Affect and Drinking Outcomes in a Pharmacobehavioral Trial for Alcohol Dependence.

Authors:  Michelle D Vaughan; Joshua N Hook; J Nile Wagley; Don Davis; Christina Hill; Bankole A Johnson; J Kim Penberthy
Journal:  Addict Disord Their Treat       Date:  2012-03

5.  The asymmetric effect of air quality on cross-industries' stock returns: evidence from China.

Authors:  Chi-Wei Su; Kai-Hua Wang; Ran Tao; Oana-Ramona Lobonţ
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-09-02       Impact factor: 4.223

6.  Mood and the market: can press reports of investors' mood predict stock prices?

Authors:  Yochi Cohen-Charash; Charles A Scherbaum; John D Kammeyer-Mueller; Barry M Staw
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Understanding Risky Behavior: The Influence of Cognitive, Emotional and Hormonal Factors on Decision-Making under Risk.

Authors:  Petko Kusev; Harry Purser; Renata Heilman; Alex J Cooke; Paul Van Schaik; Victoria Baranova; Rose Martin; Peter Ayton
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-02-01

8.  Emotions and decisions in the real world: What can we learn from quasi-field experiments?

Authors:  Syon P Bhanot; Daphne Chang; Julia Lee Cunningham; Matthew Ranson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-12-16       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  People's Financial Choice Depends on their Previous Task Success or Failure.

Authors:  Katarzyna Sekścińska
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-11-17

10.  Eagerness and Optimistically Biased Metaperception: The More Eager to Learn Others' Evaluations, the Higher the Estimation of Others' Evaluations.

Authors:  Jingyi Lu; Hebing Duan; Xiaofei Xie
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-05-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.