Literature DB >> 9877403

Can the sagittal lumbar curvature be closely approximated by an ellipse?

T J Janik1, D D Harrison, R Cailliet, S J Troyanovich, D E Harrison.   

Abstract

For the sagittal lumbar curvature, existing spinal models are based only on the anthropomorphic radiographic characteristics of one individual, or, at best, of only a few individuals. This raises questions of applicability of the modeling results to clinical situations. Because spinal coupling and loads on spinal tissues have been shown to be functions of the initial static posture, a rigorously derived neutral lumbar lordosis would be important for clinicians and spine researchers. This study presents modeling of the sagittal lumbar spine in the shape of an ellipse. Vertebral body and disc heights, derived from digitized lateral lumbar radiographs of 50 normal subjects, were used to create an ellipse along the posterior body margins from the inferior of T12 to the superior sacral base. Additional data to create an elliptical lumbar model were determined from a least-squares analysis of passing ellipses through the digitized posterior body points. This confirmed that an elliptical model closely fit the lumbar curvature with a least-squares error of 1.2 mm per digitized point. The elliptical model is approximately an 85 degrees portion of a quadrant. The semi-major and semi-minor axes, a and b, are parallel to the posterior body margin of T12 and parallel to the inferior body endplate of T12, respectively, with a semi-minor to semi-major radio of b/a=0.39. The elliptic model has a height-to-length ratio of H/L=0.963, where height is the vertical distance from inferior T12 to superior S1 and length is the arc length along George's line (along the posterior longitudinal ligament) from T12 to S1.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9877403     DOI: 10.1002/jor.1100160620

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Res        ISSN: 0736-0266            Impact factor:   3.494


  32 in total

1.  Current issues with standards in the measurement and documentation of human skeletal anatomy.

Authors:  Justin Magee; Brian McClelland; John Winder
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2012-07-02       Impact factor: 2.610

2.  Finite element analysis and cadaveric cinematic analysis of fixation options for anteriorly implanted trabecular metal interbody cages.

Authors:  Pedro Berjano; Juan Francisco Blanco; Diego Rendon; Jorge Hugo Villafañe; David Pescador; Carlos Manuel Atienza
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-10-09       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Use of fallacious arguments, Ad Hominem attacks, and biased 'expert opinions' can make CBP research 'appear flawed'.

Authors:  Deed E Harrison; Donald D Harrison; Paul A Oakley; Jason W Haas
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2006-09

4.  Evidence-based protocol for structural rehabilitation of the spine and posture: review of clinical biomechanics of posture (CBP) publications.

Authors:  Paul A Oakley; Donald D Harrison; Deed E Harrison; Jason W Haas
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2005-12

Review 5.  A review of methods for quantitative evaluation of spinal curvature.

Authors:  Tomaz Vrtovec; Franjo Pernus; Bostjan Likar
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-02-27       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  L5 pedicle subtraction osteotomy: indication, surgical technique and specificities.

Authors:  Abdulmajeed Alzakri; Louis Boissière; Derek T Cawley; Anouar Bourghli; Vincent Pointillart; Olivier Gille; Jean-Marc Vital; Ibrahim Obeid
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 7.  Current strategies for the restoration of adequate lordosis during lumbar fusion.

Authors:  Cédric Barrey; Alice Darnis
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2015-01-18

Review 8.  Evidence showing the relationship between sagittal balance and clinical outcomes in surgical treatment of degenerative spinal diseases: a literature review.

Authors:  Jean-Charles Le Huec; Antonio Faundez; Dennis Dominguez; Pierre Hoffmeyer; Stéphane Aunoble
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-09-06       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 9.  Sagittal parameters of the spine: biomechanical approach.

Authors:  Pierre Roussouly; João Luiz Pinheiro-Franco
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-07-28       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Normative values for the spine shape parameters using 3D standing analysis from a database of 268 asymptomatic Caucasian and Japanese subjects.

Authors:  Jean Charles Le Huec; Kazuhiro Hasegawa
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-03-07       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.