Literature DB >> 9876958

Efficacy of xanomeline in Alzheimer disease: cognitive improvement measured using the Computerized Neuropsychological Test Battery (CNTB).

A E Veroff1, N C Bodick, W W Offen, J J Sramek, N R Cutler.   

Abstract

The cognitive efficacy of the M1-selective muscarinic agonist xanomeline in mild-to-moderate Alzheimer disease (AD) was measured using the Computerized Neuropsychological Test Battery (CNTB) and the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-cog) in this 17-center, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Three hundred forty-three patients were randomly assigned to receive 25, 50, or 75 mg xanomeline tartrate or placebo three times daily (t.i.d.) for 24 weeks, followed by placebo for 4 weeks in a single-blind washout phase. Cognitive function was assessed at randomization and after 4, 8, 12, 24, and 28 weeks. Three hundred nineteen patients were included in an intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis; 209 completers had evaluable data at week 24. ITT analysis showed a significant (p < or = 0.05) dose-response trend and a significant (p < or = 0.05) between-group comparison favoring 75 mg t.i.d. over placebo for the CNTB summary score but not for the ADAS-cog. In the completer analysis, however, the ADAS-cog showed a significant (p < or = 0.05) dose-response trend and between-group comparison, whereas the CNTB Summary Score did not. The ADAS-cog was less sensitive to treatment effects in mildly impaired patients (ADAS-cog < 21) than in moderately impaired patients (ADAS-cog > or = 21), whereas the CNTB was sensitive in the entire study population (mean ADAS-cog = 22.5+/-9.6). Significant (p < or = 0.05) beneficial treatment effects were seen in measures of simple reaction time and delayed verbal recall, which are included in the CNTB but not in the ADAS-cog. During the single-blind placebo washout period, the ADAS-cog score of the placebo group worsened dramatically (change of 2.63 points; p < or = 0.001), whereas the CNTB score remained stable (change of 1.04 points; p=0.694). Thus, the CNTB appears to be more objective than the ADAS-cog.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9876958     DOI: 10.1097/00002093-199812000-00010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord        ISSN: 0893-0341            Impact factor:   2.703


  14 in total

1.  Application of clinical trial simulation to compare proof-of-concept study designs for drugs with a slow onset of effect; an example in Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Peter Lockwood; Wayne Ewy; David Hermann; Nick Holford
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2006-08-12       Impact factor: 4.200

2.  Topiramate dose effects on cognition: a randomized double-blind study.

Authors:  D W Loring; D J Williamson; K J Meador; F Wiegand; J Hulihan
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2010-12-09       Impact factor: 9.910

3.  Clinical Effectiveness of Muscarinic Receptor-Targeted Interventions in Neuropsychiatric Disorders: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Shivani Vaidya; Alexandre A Guerin; Leigh C Walker; Andrew J Lawrence
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2022-10-21       Impact factor: 6.497

4.  Effect of cholinergic signaling on neuronal cell bioenergetics.

Authors:  Jianghua Lu; Lezi E; Nairita Roy; Lewis Hutfles; Eva Selfridge; Eric Funk; Jeffrey M Burns; Russell H Swerdlow
Journal:  J Alzheimers Dis       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 4.472

5.  Improved cognition without adverse effects: novel M1 muscarinic potentiator compares favorably to donepezil and xanomeline in rhesus monkey.

Authors:  Joshua D Vardigan; Christopher E Cannon; Vanita Puri; Mandy Dancho; AmyJo Koser; Marion Wittmann; Scott D Kuduk; John J Renger; Jason M Uslaner
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 6.  Positive allosteric modulation of M1 and M4 muscarinic receptors as potential therapeutic treatments for schizophrenia.

Authors:  Samantha E Yohn; P Jeffrey Conn
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  2017-09-09       Impact factor: 5.250

Review 7.  Status of computerized cognitive testing in aging: a systematic review.

Authors:  Katherine Wild; Diane Howieson; Frank Webbe; Adriana Seelye; Jeffrey Kaye
Journal:  Alzheimers Dement       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 21.566

8.  In Vitro Pharmacological Characterization and In Vivo Validation of LSN3172176 a Novel M1 Selective Muscarinic Receptor Agonist Tracer Molecule for Positron Emission Tomography.

Authors:  Adrian J Mogg; Thomas Eessalu; Megan Johnson; Rebecca Wright; Helen E Sanger; Hongling Xiao; Michael G Crabtree; Alex Smith; Ellen M Colvin; Douglas Schober; Donald Gehlert; Cynthia Jesudason; Paul J Goldsmith; Michael P Johnson; Christian C Felder; Vanessa N Barth; Lisa M Broad
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  2018-04-11       Impact factor: 4.030

Review 9.  Cholinergic and glutamatergic alterations beginning at the early stages of Alzheimer disease: participation of the phospholipase A2 enzyme.

Authors:  Evelin L Schaeffer; Wagner F Gattaz
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2008-02-19       Impact factor: 4.530

10.  The evaluation of cognitive function in the dementias: methodological and regulatory considerations.

Authors:  Keith A Wesnes; John E Harrison
Journal:  Dialogues Clin Neurosci       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 5.986

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.